» Articles » PMID: 23743369

Open Versus Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair

Overview
Journal JSLS
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2013 Jun 8
PMID 23743369
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The literature reports the efficacy of the laparoscopic approach to paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair. However, its adoption as the preferred surgical approach and the risks associated with paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair have not been reviewed in a large database.

Method: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample dataset was queried from 1998 to 2005 for patients who underwent repair of a complicated (the entire stomach moves into the chest cavity) versus uncomplicated (only the upper part of the stomach protrudes into the chest) paraesophageal hiatal hernia via the laparoscopic, open abdominal, or open thoracic approach. A multivariate analysis was performed controlling for demographics and comorbidities while looking for independent risk factors for mortality.

Results: In total, 23,514 patients met the inclusion criteria. By surgical approach, 55% of patients underwent open abdominal, 35% laparoscopic, and 10% open thoracic repairs. Length of stay was significantly reduced for all patients after laparoscopic repair (P < .001). Age ≥60 years and nonwhite ethnicity were associated with significantly higher odds of death. Laparoscopic repair and obesity were associated with lower odds of death in the uncomplicated group.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia is associated with a lower mortality in the uncomplicated group. However, older age and Hispanic ethnicity increased the odds of death.

Citing Articles

Current Trends in the Management of Hiatal Hernia: A Literature Review of 10 Years of Data.

Singhal V, Md Suleman A, Senofer N, Singhal V Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71921.

PMID: 39564064 PMC: 11575107. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71921.


BRAZILIAN HERNIA AND ABDOMINAL WALL SOCIETY STATEMENT ON LARGE HIATAL HERNIAS MANAGEMENT.

Brandalise A, Herbella F, Luna R, Szachnowicz S, Sallum R, Domene C Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024; 36:e1787.

PMID: 38324849 PMC: 10841492. DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020230069e1787.


Determining the need for a thoracoscopic approach to treat a giant hiatal hernia when abdominal access is poor.

Perez Lara F, Zubizarreta Jimenez R, Prieto-Puga Arjona T, Gutierrez Delgado P, Hernandez Carmona J, Hernandez Gonzalez J World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024; 15(12):2739-2746.

PMID: 38222019 PMC: 10784824. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2739.


Robotic Hiatal Hernia Repair Associated with Higher Morbidity and Readmission Rates Compared to Laparoscopic Repair: 10-Year Analysis from the National Readmissions Database (NRD).

Klock J, Walters R, Nandipati K J Gastrointest Surg. 2022; 27(3):489-497.

PMID: 36508133 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05548-x.


Laparoscopic repair of large diaphragmatic hernia after left ventricular assist device implantation followed by orthotopic heart transplantation.

Chin K, Ward M, Meyer D, Sanchez C, Leeds S Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2021; 35(1):101-103.

PMID: 34970052 PMC: 8682844. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2021.1984820.


References
1.
Willekes C, Edoga J, Frezza E . Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Ann Surg. 1997; 225(1):31-8. PMC: 1190602. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199701000-00004. View

2.
SKINNER D, Belsey R . Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1,030 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1967; 53(1):33-54. View

3.
Nason K, Luketich J, Qureshi I, Keeley S, Trainor S, Awais O . Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia results in long-term patient satisfaction and a durable repair. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; 12(12):2066-75. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0712-7. View

4.
ANDUJAR J, Papasavas P, Birdas T, Robke J, Raftopoulos Y, Gagne D . Laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hernia is associated with a low incidence of recurrence and reoperation. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(3):444-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8823-4. View

5.
Low D, Unger T . Open repair of paraesophageal hernia: reassessment of subjective and objective outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 80(1):287-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.02.019. View