» Articles » PMID: 23739813

Dose Response of the Intravascular Contrast Agent Gadofosveset Trisodium in MR Perfusion Imaging of the Myocardium Using a Quantitative Evaluation

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2013 Jun 7
PMID 23739813
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was performed to determine the best concentration of gadofosveset at 1.5 and 3 T MRI for quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis. 18 healthy volunteers have been examined at a 1.5 and a 3 T MRI system assigned to one of three dose groups: low dose (0.00375 mmol/kg), medium dose (0.0075 mmol/kg), high dose (0.0150 mmol/kg). A T1-weighted saturation recovery turboFLASH sequence with parallel imaging was used. Two perfusion scans were performed for each field strength and volunteer. Peak signal-to-noise-ratio, maximum contrast-enhancement-ratio and myocardial blood flow (MBF) were calculated. MBF values were significantly higher at 1.5 T in the medium and the high dose groups than in the low dose group (p < 0.001). Higher MBF values could be found at 3 T for the second perfusion scan in the medium and both perfusion scans in the high dose group compared to the low dose group. Optimal dose of gadofosveset for quantitative perfusion analysis at 1.5 T is 0.00375 mmol/kg as higher doses caused overestimation of the MBF. At 3 T 0.0075 mmol/kg seems to be the best dose for a single perfusion scan, while for a second perfusion scan MBF may be overestimated.

Citing Articles

Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Bezerra H, Costa R, Reiber J, Rybicki F, Schoenhagen P, Stillman A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 30(4):683-95.

PMID: 24687406 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0405-0.

References
1.
Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, Requardt M, Weinmann H . Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol. 2005; 40(11):715-24. DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000184756.66360.d3. View

2.
Ritter C, Wilke A, Wichmann T, Beer M, Hahn D, Kostler H . Comparison of intravascular and extracellular contrast media for absolute quantification of myocardial rest-perfusion using high-resolution MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 33(5):1047-51. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22557. View

3.
Chiribiri A, Bettencourt N, Nagel E . Cardiac magnetic resonance stress testing: results and prognosis. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008; 11(1):54-60. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-009-0009-9. View

4.
Bonel H, Saar B, Hoppe H, Keo H, Husmann M, Nikolaou K . MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by using Gadofosveset at 3.0 T: diagnostic accuracy compared with selective DSA. Radiology. 2009; 253(3):879-90. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2533081627. View

5.
Naehle C, Muller A, Willinek W, Meyer C, Hestermann T, Gieseke J . First-pass and steady-state magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic vasculature using gadofosveset trisodium. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009; 30(4):809-16. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21919. View