» Articles » PMID: 23733940

Global Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production Doubled in the 20th Century

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2013 Jun 5
PMID 23733940
Citations 65
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Global increases in population, consumption, and gross domestic product raise concerns about the sustainability of the current and future use of natural resources. The human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) provides a useful measure of human intervention into the biosphere. The productive capacity of land is appropriated by harvesting or burning biomass and by converting natural ecosystems to managed lands with lower productivity. This work analyzes trends in HANPP from 1910 to 2005 and finds that although human population has grown fourfold and economic output 17-fold, global HANPP has only doubled. Despite this increase in efficiency, HANPP has still risen from 6.9 Gt of carbon per y in 1910 to 14.8 GtC/y in 2005, i.e., from 13% to 25% of the net primary production of potential vegetation. Biomass harvested per capita and year has slightly declined despite growth in consumption because of a decline in reliance on bioenergy and higher conversion efficiencies of primary biomass to products. The rise in efficiency is overwhelmingly due to increased crop yields, albeit frequently associated with substantial ecological costs, such as fossil energy inputs, soil degradation, and biodiversity loss. If humans can maintain the past trend lines in efficiency gains, we estimate that HANPP might only grow to 27-29% by 2050, but providing large amounts of bioenergy could increase global HANPP to 44%. This result calls for caution in refocusing the energy economy on land-based resources and for strategies that foster the continuation of increases in land-use efficiency without excessively increasing ecological costs of intensification.

Citing Articles

Conflict between cattle ranching and the conservation of jaguar (Panthera onca) and puma (Puma concolor) in the Amazon arc of deforestation.

Diaz-Vaquero V, Negroes N, Fonseca C, Silveira L, Jacomo A, Quevedo M PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0312077.

PMID: 39565806 PMC: 11578515. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312077.


Widening global variability in grassland biomass since the 1980s.

MacDougall A, Esch E, Chen Q, Carroll O, Bonner C, Ohlert T Nat Ecol Evol. 2024; 8(10):1877-1888.

PMID: 39103674 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02500-x.


New criteria for sustainable land use planning of metropolitan green infrastructures in the tropical Andes.

LaRota-Aguilera M, Zapata-Caldas E, Buitrago-Bermudez O, Marull J Landsc Ecol. 2024; 39(6):112.

PMID: 38817738 PMC: 11133195. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-024-01911-2.


Is the threatened land crab conquering human-dominated systems?.

Riascos J, Obonaga L, Ramos J Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(4):e10737.

PMID: 38681183 PMC: 11046080. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10737.


Human appropriation of net primary production as driver of change in landscape-scale vertebrate richness.

Reiter K, Plutzar C, Moser D, Semenchuk P, Erb K, Essl F Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2024; 32(6):855-866.

PMID: 38504954 PMC: 10946509. DOI: 10.1111/geb.13671.


References
1.
Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort B . Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(50):20260-4. PMC: 3250154. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108. View

2.
Foley J, DeFries R, Asner G, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter S . Global consequences of land use. Science. 2005; 309(5734):570-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1111772. View

3.
Foley J, Ramankutty N, Brauman K, Cassidy E, Gerber J, Johnston M . Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 2011; 478(7369):337-42. DOI: 10.1038/nature10452. View

4.
Running S . Ecology. A measurable planetary boundary for the biosphere. Science. 2012; 337(6101):1458-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1227620. View

5.
Steffen W, Crutzen J, McNeill J . The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of Nature?. Ambio. 2008; 36(8):614-21. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:taahno]2.0.co;2. View