Impact of a Computer-based Diagnostic Decision Support Tool on the Differential Diagnoses of Medicine Residents
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Computer-based medical diagnostic decision support systems have been used for decades, initially as stand-alone applications. More recent versions have been tested for their effectiveness in enhancing the diagnostic ability of clinicians.
Objective: To determine if viewing a rank-ordered list of diagnostic possibilities from a medical diagnostic decision support system improves residents' differential diagnoses or management plans.
Method: Twenty first-year internal medicine residents at Massachusetts General Hospital viewed 3 deidentified case descriptions of real patients. All residents completed a web-based questionnaire, entering the differential diagnosis and management plan before and after seeing the diagnostic decision support system's suggested list of diseases. In all 3 exercises, the actual case diagnosis was first on the system's list. Each resident served as his or her own control (pretest/posttest).
Results: For all 3 cases, a substantial percentage of residents changed their primary considered diagnosis after reviewing the system's suggested diagnoses, and a number of residents who had not initially listed a "further action" (laboratory test, imaging study, or referral) added or changed their management options after using the system. Many residents (20% to 65% depending on the case) improved their differential diagnosis from before to after viewing the system's suggestions. The average time to complete all 3 cases was 15.4 minutes. Most residents thought that viewing the medical diagnostic decision support system's list of suggestions was helpful.
Conclusion: Viewing a rank-ordered list of diagnostic possibilities from a diagnostic decision support tool had a significant beneficial effect on the quality of first-year medicine residents' differential diagnoses and management plans.
Usefulness of a medical interview support application for residents: A pilot study.
Matsuoka A, Miike T, Yamazaki H, Higuchi M, Komaki M, Shinada K PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0274159.
PMID: 36067154 PMC: 9447879. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274159.
Clinical Decision Support Systems.
Teufel A, Binder H Visc Med. 2022; 37(6):491-498.
PMID: 35087899 PMC: 8738909. DOI: 10.1159/000519420.
Physicians' Perceptions of the Use of a Chatbot for Information Seeking: Qualitative Study.
Koman J, Fauvelle K, Schuck S, Texier N, Mebarki A J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(11):e15185.
PMID: 33170134 PMC: 7685916. DOI: 10.2196/15185.
Vaidyam A, Linggonegoro D, Torous J Can J Psychiatry. 2020; 66(4):339-348.
PMID: 33063526 PMC: 8172347. DOI: 10.1177/0706743720966429.
Grigull L, Mehmecke S, Rother A, Bloss S, Klemann C, Schumacher U PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0222637.
PMID: 31600214 PMC: 6786570. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222637.