» Articles » PMID: 23727554

The Effect of Male Teenage Passengers on Male Teenage Drivers: Findings from a Driving Simulator Study

Overview
Journal Accid Anal Prev
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2013 Jun 4
PMID 23727554
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies have shown that teenage drivers are less attentive, more frequently exhibit risky driving behavior, and have a higher fatal crash risk in the presence of peers. The effects of direct peer pressure and conversation on young drivers have been examined. Little is known about the impact on driving performance of the presence of a non-interacting passenger and subtle modes of peer influence, such as perceived social norms. The goal of this study was to examine if teenagers would engage in more risky driving practices and be less attentive in the presence of a passenger (vs. driving alone) as well as with a risk-accepting (vs. risk-averse) passenger. A confederate portrayed the passenger's characteristics mainly by his non-verbal attitude. The relationship between driver characteristics and driving behavior in the presence of a passenger was also examined. Thirty-six male participants aged 16-17 years old were randomly assigned to drive with a risk-accepting or risk-averse passenger. Main outcomes included speed, headway, gap acceptance, eye glances at hazards, and horizontal eye movement. Driver characteristics such as tolerance of deviance, susceptibility to peer pressure, and self-esteem were measured. Compared to solo driving, the presence of a passenger was associated with significantly fewer eye glances at hazards and a trend for fewer horizontal eye movements. Contrary to the hypothesis, however, Passenger Presence was associated with waiting for a greater number of vehicles to pass before initiating a left turn. Results also showed, contrary to the hypothesis, that participants with the risk-accepting passenger maintained significantly longer headway with the lead vehicle and engaged in more eye glances at hazards than participants with the risk-averse passenger. Finally, when driving with the passenger, earlier initiation of a left turn in a steady stream of oncoming vehicles was significantly associated with higher tolerance of deviance and susceptibility to peer pressure, while fewer eye glances at hazards was linked to lower self-esteem. While the results of this study were mixed, they suggest that the presence of a teenage passenger can affect some aspects of teenage driver behavior even in the absence of overt pressure and distraction. Results are discussed in relation to theoretical concepts of social influence and social facilitation models.

Citing Articles

Eye tracking use in researching driver distraction: A scientometric and qualitative literature review approach.

Cvahte Ojstersek T, Topolsek D J Eye Mov Res. 2021; 12(3).

PMID: 33828732 PMC: 7880134. DOI: 10.16910/jemr.12.3.5.


Peer Passenger Norms and Pressure: Experimental Effects on Simulated Driving Among Teenage Males.

Bingham C, Simons-Morton B, Pradhan A, Li K, Almani F, Falk E Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2016; 41(A):124-137.

PMID: 27818610 PMC: 5094360. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.007.


Teen Drivers' Perceptions of Their Peer Passengers: Qualitative Study.

Ehsani J, Haynie D, Luthers C, Perlus J, Gerber E, Ouimet M Transp Res Rec. 2016; 2516:22-26.

PMID: 27346920 PMC: 4920469. DOI: 10.3141/2516-04.


Assessing Risk-Taking in a Driving Simulator Study: Modeling Longitudinal Semi-Continuous Driving Data Using a Two-Part Regression Model with Correlated Random Effects.

Tran V, Liu D, Pradhan A, Li K, Bingham C, Simons-Morton B Anal Methods Accid Res. 2016; 5-6:17-27.

PMID: 26894036 PMC: 4755502. DOI: 10.1016/j.amar.2014.12.001.


Evaluation of a Risk Awareness Perception Training Program on Novice Teen Driver Behavior at Left-Turn Intersections.

McDonald C, Kandadai V, Loeb H, Seacrist T, Lee Y, Bonfiglio D Transp Res Rec. 2015; 2516:15-21.

PMID: 26709331 PMC: 4689436. DOI: 10.3141/2516-03.


References
1.
Cohen G, Prinstein M . Peer contagion of aggression and health risk behavior among adolescent males: an experimental investigation of effects on public conduct and private attitudes. Child Dev. 2006; 77(4):967-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00913.x. View

2.
Simons-Morton B, Hartos J, Leaf W, Preusser D . The effect on teen driving outcomes of the Checkpoints Program in a state-wide trial. Accid Anal Prev. 2006; 38(5):907-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.001. View

3.
Chein J, Albert D, OBrien L, Uckert K, Steinberg L . Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain's reward circuitry. Dev Sci. 2011; 14(2):F1-10. PMC: 3075496. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01035.x. View

4.
Simons-Morton B, Ouimet M, Zhang Z, Klauer S, Lee S, Wang J . The effect of passengers and risk-taking friends on risky driving and crashes/near crashes among novice teenagers. J Adolesc Health. 2011; 49(6):587-93. PMC: 3218800. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.009. View

5.
Collins R, Parks G, Marlatt G . Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985; 53(2):189-200. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.53.2.189. View