» Articles » PMID: 23724266

Results and Complications of 1104 Surgeries for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency

Overview
Date 2013 Jun 1
PMID 23724266
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) means that the velopharyngeal closure is inadequate or disturbed. VPI may be organic or functional, congenital or acquired and is caused by structural alterations or paresis. The symptoms are primarily to be found in speech (hypernasality), more rarely in swallowing and hearing. The management types are as follows: speech therapy, surgery, speech bulb, and others. Surgery is indicated if the symptoms of VPI cannot be improved by speech therapy. Among the operative methods, velopharyngoplasty constitutes the basis of the surgery. The pharyngeal flap was incorporated and survived in 98.1% of the cases, hyperrhinophony disappeared or became minimal in 90% after surgery in our material (1104 cases). The speech results seemed to be the same with superiorly or inferiorly based pharyngeal flap. The Furlow technique, push-back procedure, the sphincteroplasty, and the augmentation were indicated by us if the VP gap was less than 7 mm; these methods may also be used as secondary operation. We observed among 1104 various surgeries severe hemorrhage in 5 cases, aspiration in 2 cases, significant nasal obstruction in 68 patients, OSAS in 5 cases; tracheotomy was necessary in 2 cases. Although the complication rate is rare, it must always be considered that this is not a life-saving but a speech-correcting operation. A tailor-made superiorly based pharyngeal flap is suggested today, possibly in the age of 5 years.

Citing Articles

Assessment of the efficacy and analysis of prognostic factors of flap division for postoperative airway obstruction following posterior pharyngeal flap.

Li Y, Shi B, Li J Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024; 42(6):755-763.

PMID: 39610072 PMC: 11669923. DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024218.


IS SURGICAL TREATMENT OF VELOPHARYNGEAL INSUFFICIENCY BY MYOMUCOSAL POSTERIOR PHARYNGEAL FLAP A CONTRAINDICATION FOR NASAL INTUBATION? A NARRATIVE REVIEW.

Smiljanic I, Knezevic P, Milic M, Tarle M, Laus P, Jurisic I Acta Clin Croat. 2024; 62(Suppl1):91-98.

PMID: 38746620 PMC: 11090225. DOI: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.s1.11.


Swallowing improvement surgeries.

Cotaoco C, Ueha R, Koyama M, Sato T, Goto T, Kondo K Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(6):2807-2817.

PMID: 38265461 PMC: 11065918. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08452-z.


De-mucosalized pharyngeal flap: a modified technique for selected cases of velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Askar S Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018; 275(7):1939-1943.

PMID: 29804131 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-5018-0.


Postoperative evaluation of the folded pharyngeal flap operation for cleft palate patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Yoshimasu H, Sato Y, Mishimagi T, Negishi A Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 5(1):62-6.

PMID: 26389036 PMC: 4555951. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.161066.

References
1.
Ysunza A, Garcia-Velasco M, Garcia-Garcia M, Haro R, Valencia M . Obstructive sleep apnea secondary to surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30(4):387-90. DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0387_osasts_2.3.co_2. View

2.
Minami trt , Kaplan E, Wu G, Jobe R . Velopharyngeal incompetence without overt cleft palate. A collective review and experience with 98 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975; 55(5):573-87. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197505000-00007. View

3.
Hofer S, Dhar B, Robinson P, Goorhuis-Brouwer S, Nicolai J . A 10-year review of perioperative complications in pharyngeal flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 110(6):1393-7; discussion 1398-1400. DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000029347.67721.84. View

4.
ISSHIKI N, Honjow I, Morimoto M . Indication and the results of pharyngeal flap operation. Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1971; 200(2):158-68. DOI: 10.1007/BF00418199. View

5.
Morita T, Kurata K, Hiratsuka Y, Ito J . A preoperative sleep study with nasal airway occlusion in pharyngeal flap surgery. Am J Otolaryngol. 2004; 25(5):334-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2004.04.006. View