» Articles » PMID: 23721816

Functional Integration of Skeletal Traits: an Intraskeletal Assessment of Bone Size, Mineralization, and Volume Covariance

Overview
Journal Bone
Date 2013 Jun 1
PMID 23721816
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding the functional integration of skeletal traits and how they naturally vary within and across populations will benefit assessments of functional adaptation directed towards interpreting bone stiffness in contemporary and past humans. Moreover, investigating how these traits intraskeletally vary will guide us closer towards predicting fragility from a single skeletal site. Using an osteological collection of 115 young adult male and female African-Americans, we assessed the functional relationship between bone robustness (i.e. total area/length), cortical tissue mineral density (Ct.TMD), and cortical area (Ct.Ar) for the upper and lower limbs. All long bones demonstrated significant trait covariance (p < 0.005) independent of body size, with slender bones having 25-50% less Ct.Ar and 5-8% higher Ct.TMD compared to robust bones. Robustness statistically explained 10.2-28% of Ct.TMD and 26.6-64.6% of Ct.Ar within male and female skeletal elements. This covariance is systemic throughout the skeleton, with either the slender or robust phenotype consistently represented within all long bones for each individual. These findings suggest that each person attains a unique trait set by adulthood that is both predictable by robustness and partially independent of environmental influences. The variation in these functionally integrated traits allows for the maximization of tissue stiffness and minimization of mass so that regardless of which phenotype is present, a given bone is reasonably stiff and strong, and sufficiently adapted to perform routine, habitual loading activities. Covariation intrinsic to functional adaptation suggests that whole bone stiffness depends upon particular sets of traits acquired during growth, presumably through differing levels of cellular activity, resulting in differing tissue morphology and composition. The outcomes of this intraskeletal examination of robustness and its correlates may have significant value in our progression towards improved clinical assessments of bone strength and fragility.

Citing Articles

Characterizing Bone Phenotypes Related to Skeletal Fragility Using Advanced Medical Imaging.

Whittier D, Bevers M, Geusens P, van den Bergh J, Gabel L Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2023; 21(6):685-697.

PMID: 37884821 PMC: 10724303. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-023-00830-6.


Preventive Care for Adults With Cerebral Palsy and Other Neurodevelopmental Disabilities: Are We Missing the Point?.

Whitney D, Rabideau M, McKee M, Hurvitz E Front Integr Neurosci. 2022; 16:866765.

PMID: 35464602 PMC: 9021436. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2022.866765.


Mechanical metric for skeletal biomechanics derived from spectral analysis of stiffness matrix.

Henys P, Kuchar M, Hajek P, Hammer N Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):15690.

PMID: 34344907 PMC: 8333423. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94998-5.


Systems genetics in diversity outbred mice inform BMD GWAS and identify determinants of bone strength.

Al-Barghouthi B, Mesner L, Calabrese G, Brooks D, Tommasini S, Bouxsein M Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):3408.

PMID: 34099702 PMC: 8184749. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23649-0.


Differential changes in bone strength of two inbred mouse strains following administration of a sclerostin-neutralizing antibody during growth.

Mathis N, Adaniya E, Smith L, Robling A, Jepsen K, Schlecht S PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0214520.

PMID: 30947279 PMC: 6448823. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214520.


References
1.
Lovejoy C . Evolution of human walking. Sci Am. 1988; 259(5):118-25. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican1188-118. View

2.
Epelboym Y, Gendron R, Mayer J, Fusco J, Nasser P, Gross G . The interindividual variation in femoral neck width is associated with the acquisition of predictable sets of morphological and tissue-quality traits and differential bone loss patterns. J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27(7):1501-10. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1614. View

3.
Pearson O, Lieberman D . The aging of Wolff's "law": ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004; Suppl 39:63-99. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20155. View

4.
Mensforth R, Latimer B . Hamann-Todd Collection aging studies: osteoporosis fracture syndrome. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989; 80(4):461-79. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330800406. View

5.
Jepsen K . Functional interactions among morphologic and tissue quality traits define bone quality. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 469(8):2150-9. PMC: 3126971. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1706-9. View