Systematically Reviewing and Synthesizing Evidence from Conversation Analytic and Related Discursive Research to Inform Healthcare Communication Practice and Policy: an Illustrated Guide

Overview

Journal BMC Med Res Methodol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties General Medicine
Health Services

Date 2013 Jun 1

PMID 23721181

Citations 17

Authors

Ruth H Parry

Victoria Land

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Healthcare delivery is largely accomplished in and through conversations between people, and healthcare quality and effectiveness depend enormously upon the communication practices employed within these conversations. An important body of evidence about these practices has been generated by conversation analysis and related discourse analytic approaches, but there has been very little systematic reviewing of this evidence.

Methods: We developed an approach to reviewing evidence from conversation analytic and related discursive research through the following procedures: • reviewing existing systematic review methods and our own prior experience of applying these • clarifying distinctive features of conversation analytic and related discursive work which must be taken into account when reviewing • holding discussions within a review advisory team that included members with expertise in healthcare research, conversation analytic research, and systematic reviewing • attempting and then refining procedures through conducting an actual review which examined evidence about how people talk about difficult future issues including illness progression and dying

Results: We produced a step-by-step guide which we describe here in terms of eight stages, and which we illustrate from our 'Review of Future Talk'. The guide incorporates both established procedures for systematic reviewing, and new techniques designed for working with conversation analytic evidence.

Conclusions: The guide is designed to inform systematic reviews of conversation analytic and related discursive evidence on specific domains and topics. Whilst we designed it for reviews that aim at informing healthcare practice and policy, it is flexible and could be used for reviews with other aims, for instance those aiming to underpin research programmes and projects. We advocate systematically reviewing conversation analytic and related discursive findings using this approach in order to translate them into a form that is credible and useful to healthcare practitioners, educators and policy-makers.

Citing Articles

Communicating treatment options to older patients with advanced kidney disease: a conversation analysis study.

Selman L, Shaw C, Sowden R, Murtagh F, Tulsky J, Parry R BMC Nephrol. 2024; 25(1):417.

PMID: 39574029 PMC: 11580699. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03855-w.

The Role of Language in Remote Healthcare Triage: A Meta-Aggregative Review.

Spek M, van Braak M, Erkelens D, Rutten F, Venekamp R, Zwart D J Adv Nurs. 2024; 81(4):1639-1662.

PMID: 39382340 PMC: 11896837. DOI: 10.1111/jan.16528.

Communication in Telehealth: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Conversation-Analytic Research.

Seuren L, Ilomaki S, Dalmaijer E, Shaw S, Stommel W Res Lang Soc Interact. 2024; 57(1):73-90.

PMID: 38741749 PMC: 11090155. DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2024.2305045.

RealTalk evidence-based communication training resources: development of conversation analysis-based materials to support training in end-of-life-related health and social care conversations.

Parry R, Whittaker B, Pino M, Jenkins L, Worthington E, Faull C BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22(1):637.

PMID: 35996125 PMC: 9395846. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03641-y.

Experiences of treatment-resistant mental health conditions in primary care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Talbot A, Lee C, Ryan S, Roberts N, Mahtani K, Albury C BMC Prim Care. 2022; 23(1):207.

PMID: 35971077 PMC: 9380292. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01819-3.

References

Parry R . Practitioners' accounts for treatment actions and recommendations in physiotherapy: when do they occur, how are they structured, what do they do?. Sociol Health Illn. 2009; 31(6):835-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01187.x. View

Sheon N, Lee S, Facente S . From questionnaire to conversation: a structural intervention to improve HIV test counseling. Patient Educ Couns. 2010; 81(3):468-75. PMC: 2997860. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.08.011. View

Seymour J, French J, Richardson E . Dying matters: let's talk about it. BMJ. 2010; 341:c4860. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c4860. View

Nowak P . Synthesis of qualitative linguistic research--a pilot review integrating and generalizing findings on doctor-patient interaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 82(3):429-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.022. View

Cox K, Bird L, Arthur A, Kennedy S, Pollock K, Kumar A . Public attitudes to death and dying in the UK: a review of published literature. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2014; 3(1):37-45. DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000203. View

Bruinsma S, Rietjens J, Seymour J, Anquinet L, van der Heide A . The experiences of relatives with the practice of palliative sedation: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012; 44(3):431-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.09.006. View

Toerien M, Shaw R, Duncan R, Reuber M . Offering patients choices: a pilot study of interactions in the seizure clinic. Epilepsy Behav. 2011; 20(2):312-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.11.004. View

Greenhalgh T, Peacock R . Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ. 2005; 331(7524):1064-5. PMC: 1283190. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68. View

Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R . RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. BMC Med. 2013; 11:21. PMC: 3558331. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-21. View

10.

Haskard Zolnierek K, DiMatteo M . Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009; 47(8):826-34. PMC: 2728700. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819a5acc. View

11.

Beach W . Between dad and son: initiating, delivering, and assimilating bad cancer news. Health Commun. 2002; 14(3):271-98. DOI: 10.1207/S15327027HC1403_1. View

12.

Jones A . Creating history: documents and patient participation in nurse-patient interviews. Sociol Health Illn. 2009; 31(6):907-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01190.x. View

13.

Stewart M . Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995; 152(9):1423-33. PMC: 1337906. View

14.

Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K . Realist review--a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005; 10 Suppl 1:21-34. DOI: 10.1258/1355819054308530. View

15.

Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J . Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6:35. PMC: 1559637. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-35. View

16.

Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche P, Ioannidis J . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4):W65-94. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136. View

17.

Cherlin E, Fried T, Prigerson H, Schulman-Green D, Johnson-Hurzeler R, Bradley E . Communication between physicians and family caregivers about care at the end of life: when do discussions occur and what is said?. J Palliat Med. 2005; 8(6):1176-85. PMC: 1459281. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.1176. View

18.

Dixon-Woods M, Shaw R, Agarwal S, Smith J . The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13(3):223-5. PMC: 1743851. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.13.3.223. View

19.

Mangione-Smith R, Stivers T, Elliott M, McDonald L, Heritage J . Online commentary during the physical examination: a communication tool for avoiding inappropriate antibiotic prescribing?. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 56(2):313-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00029-1. View

20.

Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volmink J . Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8:21. PMC: 2374791. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-21. View