» Articles » PMID: 23717051

Novel Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Fixation Device Reduces Slippage

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2013 May 30
PMID 23717051
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Clinically significant laxity occurs in 10%-30% of knees after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Graft slippage and tension loss at the hamstring graft tibial fixation site during and after reconstruction surgery contribute to postoperative joint laxity and are detrimental to long-term knee stability and graft properties. Limiting graft slippage will reduce associated complications. We sought to compare the in vitro mechanical properties and in vivo joint stabilization, postoperative limb use, and graft incorporation of the novel GraftGrab™ (GG) device designed to reduce hamstring graft tibial fixation slippage with the commercially available bioabsorbable Bio-Post™ and spiked washer (BP). Mechanical testing was performed on canine tibia-hamstring graft constructs to quantify initial fixation properties. In vivo joint stabilization, postoperative limb use and graft incorporation of hamstring graft reconstructions were determined in a canine model. Outcomes included tibial translation and ground reaction forces preoperatively and 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively, three-dimensional graft and bone tunnel dimensions at the latter two time points, and graft-bone microstructure, as well as mechanical properties 8 weeks after implantation. Immediately after fixation, all grafts slipped from the BP constructs versus about 30% of GG constructs. In vivo limb use remained low, and tibial translation increased with time in the BP cohort. These results together confirm that initial graft slippage is lower with GG versus BP extracortical hamstring graft tibial fixation. In addition, postoperative recovery and joint stability are more consistent with the GG. This information supports the GG as an alternative to extracortical tibial hamstring graft fixation that has procedural advantages over current implants and reduces graft failure from slippage.

Citing Articles

Agmatine for Pain Management in Dogs With Coxofemoral Joint Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study.

Taguchi T, Koh R, Takawira C, Rademacher N, Gilad G, Aronson R Front Vet Sci. 2019; 5:311.

PMID: 30631768 PMC: 6315183. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00311.

References
1.
Lopez M, Hagquist W, Jeffrey S, Gilbertson S, Markel M . Instrumented measurement of in vivo anterior-posterior translation in the canine knee to assess anterior cruciate integrity. J Orthop Res. 2004; 22(5):949-54. PMC: 1924914. DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.10.017. View

2.
Magen H, Howell S, Hull M . Structural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts. Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27(1):35-43. DOI: 10.1177/03635465990270011401. View

3.
Claes S, Verdonk P, Forsyth R, Bellemans J . The "ligamentization" process in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: what happens to the human graft? A systematic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(11):2476-83. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511402662. View

4.
Weiler A, Hoffmann R, Bail H, Rehm O, Sudkamp N . Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II: Histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep. Arthroscopy. 2002; 18(2):124-35. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2002.30657. View

5.
Rodeo S, Arnoczky S, Torzilli P, Hidaka C, Warren R . Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75(12):1795-803. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199312000-00009. View