» Articles » PMID: 23709580

Early Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting May Offer Non-inferior Treatment for Symptomatic Cases of Carotid Artery Stenosis

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 May 28
PMID 23709580
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Early intervention is desirable in patients presenting with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) referable to carotid artery stenosis because of the high incidence of recurrent ischemic events within 48 h post-ictus. However, the optimal timing of performing carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) in these patients remains unclear amid concerns for an elevated risk of perioperative complications. The primary outcome of this study was the combined incidence of major perioperative complications (stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), death) based on timing of CAS relative to symptom onset.

Methods: A prospectively maintained database of all neuroendovascular procedures at our hospital was searched for consecutive cases of extracranial internal CAS procedures performed for symptomatic atherosclerotic carotid stenosis between January 2009 and January 2012. Rates of perioperative complications including 30-day stroke, MI and death were assembled in a total of 221 patients.

Results: The primary outcome was not statistically different among groups stratified based on intervention timing, with a combined incidence of stroke, MI or death of 7.1% in patients treated within 2 days, 4.5% in patients treated between days 3 and 7, 2.8% in patients treated between days 8 and 14 and 3.7% in patients treated between days 15 and 90 (p=0.749, Fisher exact test).

Conclusions: Our results support the conclusion that early CAS (within 2 days) carries no additional risks compared with CAS after 2 days or any other timing of the intervention up to 90 days. Early CAS may represent a reasonable option for acute revascularization to minimize the risk of perioperative stroke and overall perioperative complications.

Citing Articles

Safety and efficacy of symptomatic carotid artery stenting performed in an emergency setting.

Quispe-Orozco D, Limaye K, Zevallos C, Farooqui M, Mendez-Ruiz A, Ansari S Interv Neuroradiol. 2020; 27(3):411-418.

PMID: 33283595 PMC: 8190945. DOI: 10.1177/1591019920977552.


Impact of Time Interval between Index Event and Stenting on Periprocedural Risk in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Han W, Hwang G, Oh S, Lee J, Kim M, Chung B J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020; 63(5):598-606.

PMID: 32883055 PMC: 7477147. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0113.


Risk of Stroke or Death Is Associated With the Timing of Carotid Artery Stenting for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Secondary Data Analysis of the German Statutory Quality Assurance Database.

Tsantilas P, Kuehnl A, Kallmayer M, Knappich C, Schmid S, Breitkreuz T J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7(7).

PMID: 29588311 PMC: 5907586. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007983.


One swallow does not a summer make but many swallows do: accumulating clinical evidence for nearly-eliminated peri-procedural and 30-day complications with mesh-covered stents transforms the carotid revascularisation field.

Musialek P, Hopkins L, Siddiqui A Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2017; 13(2):95-106.

PMID: 28798779 PMC: 5545669. DOI: 10.5114/pwki.2017.69012.


Treatment Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting Underwent within 14 Days of Stroke Onset - Consideration of Safety and Efficacy of Urgent Carotid Artery Stenting for Neurologically Progressing Patients.

Kanematsu Y, Satomi J, Kuwayama K, Yamaguchi I, Yoshioka S, Kinouchi T Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017; 57(6):278-283.

PMID: 28381652 PMC: 5495959. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2016-0236.