Determination of Proton Affinities and Acidity Constants of Sugars
Overview
Affiliations
Proton transfer reactions play a key role in the conversion of biomass derived sugars to chemicals. In this study, we employ high level ab initio theoretical methods, in tandem with solvation effects to calculate the proton affinities (PA) and acidity constants (pKa) of various d-glucose and d-fructose tautomers (protonation-deprotonation processes). In addition, we compare the theoretically derived pH values of sugar solutions against experimentally measured pH values in our lab. Our results demonstrate that the protonation of any of the O atoms of the sugars is thermodynamically preferred without any significant variation in the PA values. Intramolecular hydrogen transfers, dehydration reactions, and ring-opening processes were observed, resulting from the protonation of specific hydroxyl groups on the sugars. Regarding the deprotonation processes (pKa), we found that the sugars' anomeric hydroxyls exhibit the highest acidity. The theoretically calculated pH values of sugar solutions are in excellent agreement with experimental pH measurements at low sugar concentrations. At higher sugar concentrations the calculations predict less acidic solutions than the experiments. In this case, we expect the sugars to act as solvents increasing the proton solvation energy and the acidity of the solutions. We demonstrated through linear relationships that the pKa values are correlated with the relative stability of the conjugate bases. The latter is related to hydrogen bonding and polarization of the C-O(-) bond. A plausible explanation for the good performance of the direct method in calculating the pKa values of sugars can be the presence of intramolecular hydrogen bonds on the conjugate base. Both theory and experiments manifest that fructose is a stronger acid than glucose, which is of significant importance in self-catalyzed biomass-relevant dehydration reactions.
Stereoselective Conversions of Carbohydrate Anomeric Hydroxyl Group in Basic and Neutral Conditions.
Khaleri M, Li Q Molecules. 2025; 30(1.
PMID: 39795176 PMC: 11722021. DOI: 10.3390/molecules30010120.
Parallel and High Throughput Reaction Monitoring with Computer Vision.
Barrington H, McCabe T, Donnachie K, Fyfe C, McFall A, Gladkikh M Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2024; 64(1):e202413395.
PMID: 39166494 PMC: 11701362. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202413395.
Beszterda M, Franski R Anal Sci Adv. 2024; 1(3):143-151.
PMID: 38716131 PMC: 10989144. DOI: 10.1002/ansa.202000013.
Wongvitvichot W, Thitiprasert S, Thongchul N, Chaisuwan T Bioresour Bioprocess. 2024; 10(1):58.
PMID: 38647753 PMC: 10992777. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-023-00672-1.
Warthegau S, Meier S Molecules. 2024; 29(6).
PMID: 38543004 PMC: 10975964. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29061368.