» Articles » PMID: 23702334

Cidofovir Selectivity is Based on the Different Response of Normal and Cancer Cells to DNA Damage

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2013 May 25
PMID 23702334
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cidofovir (CDV) proved efficacious in treatment of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) hyperplasias. Antiproliferative effects of CDV have been associated with apoptosis induction, S-phase accumulation, and increased levels of tumor suppressor proteins. However, the molecular mechanisms for the selectivity and antitumor activity of CDV against HPV-transformed cells remain unexplained.

Methods: We evaluated CDV drug metabolism and incorporation into cellular DNA, in addition to whole genome gene expression profiling by means of microarrays in two HPV(+) cervical carcinoma cells, HPV- immortalized keratinocytes, and normal keratinocytes.

Results: Determination of the metabolism and drug incorporation of CDV into genomic DNA demonstrated a higher rate of drug incorporation in HPV(+) tumor cells and immortalized keratinocytes compared to normal keratinocytes. Gene expression profiling clearly showed distinct and specific drug effects in the cell types investigated. Although an effect on inflammatory response was seen in all cell types, different pathways were identified in normal keratinocytes compared to immortalized keratinocytes and HPV(+) tumor cells. Notably, Rho GTPase pathways, LXR/RXR pathways, and acute phase response signaling were exclusively activated in immortalized cells. CDV exposed normal keratinocytes displayed activated cell cycle regulation upon DNA damage signaling to allow DNA repair via homologous recombination, resulting in genomic stability and survival. Although CDV induced cell cycle arrest in HPV- immortalized cells, DNA repair was not activated in these cells. In contrast, HPV(+) cells lacked cell cycle regulation, leading to genomic instability and eventually apoptosis.

Conclusions: Taken together, our data provide novel insights into the mechanism of action of CDV and its selectivity for HPV-transformed cells. The proposed mechanism suggests that this selectivity is based on the inability of HPV(+) cells to respond to DNA damage, rather than on a direct anti-HPV effect. Since cell cycle control is deregulated by the viral oncoproteins E6 and E7 in HPV(+) cells, these cells are more susceptible to DNA damage than normal keratinocytes. Our findings underline the therapeutic potential of CDV for HPV-associated malignancies as well as other neoplasias.

Citing Articles

Brincidofovir inhibits polyomavirus infection .

Butic A, Katz Z, Jin G, Fukushima K, Hazama M, Lukacher A mBio. 2024; 15(8):e0104924.

PMID: 38953354 PMC: 11323531. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01049-24.


Repurposing of Antimicrobial Agents for Cancer Therapy: What Do We Know?.

Pfab C, Schnobrich L, Eldnasoury S, Gessner A, El-Najjar N Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(13).

PMID: 34206772 PMC: 8269327. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133193.


Global gene methylation profiling of common warts caused by human papillomaviruses infection.

Alghamdi M, Al-Eitan L, Tarkhan A, Al-Qarqaz F Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021; 28(1):612-622.

PMID: 33424347 PMC: 7783806. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.10.050.


The Antiviral Agent Cidofovir Induces DNA Damage and Mitotic Catastrophe in HPV-Positive and -Negative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas In Vitro.

Verhees F, Legemaate D, Demers I, Jacobs R, Haakma W, Rousch M Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11(7).

PMID: 31262012 PMC: 6678333. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11070919.


Cidofovir is active against human papillomavirus positive and negative head and neck and cervical tumor cells by causing DNA damage as one of its working mechanisms.

Mertens B, Nogueira T, Stranska R, Naesens L, Andrei G, Snoeck R Oncotarget. 2016; 7(30):47302-47318.

PMID: 27331622 PMC: 5216943. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10100.


References
1.
De Brouwer S, Mestdagh P, Lambertz I, Pattyn F, De Paepe A, Westermann F . Dickkopf-3 is regulated by the MYCN-induced miR-17-92 cluster in neuroblastoma. Int J Cancer. 2011; 130(11):2591-8. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26295. View

2.
Perry M . The regulation of the p53-mediated stress response by MDM2 and MDM4. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010; 2(1):a000968. PMC: 2827903. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000968. View

3.
Gualdrini F, Corvetta D, Cantilena S, Chayka O, Tanno B, Raschella G . Addiction of MYCN amplified tumours to B-MYB underscores a reciprocal regulatory loop. Oncotarget. 2011; 1(4):278-288. PMC: 3248110. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.138. View

4.
Van Pachterbeke C, Bucella D, Rozenberg S, Manigart Y, Gilles C, Larsimont D . Topical treatment of CIN 2+ by cidofovir: results of a phase II, double-blind, prospective, placebo-controlled study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 115(1):69-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.042. View

5.
El Roz A, Bard J, Huvelin J, Nazih H . LXR agonists and ABCG1-dependent cholesterol efflux in MCF-7 breast cancer cells: relation to proliferation and apoptosis. Anticancer Res. 2012; 32(7):3007-13. View