» Articles » PMID: 23702009

A 3-center Comparison of 1-year Mortality Outcomes Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement on the Basis of Propensity Score Matching Among Intermediate-risk Surgical Patients

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to compare all-cause mortality in patients at intermediate surgical risk undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

Background: Physicians are selecting "lower" surgical risk patients to undergo TAVI. No clinical data exist about the clinical outcomes of TAVI versus SAVR among intermediate-surgical-risk patients.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI or SAVR. Propensity-score matched pairs of TAVI and SAVR patients with Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) scores between 3% and 8% made up the study population. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year.

Results: Between November 2006 and January 2010, 3,666 consecutive patients underwent either TAVI (n = 782) or SAVR (n = 2,884). Four hundred five TAVI patients were matched to 405 SAVR patients. Of matched TAVI patients, 99 (24%) patients had STS scores <3%, 255 (63%) had scores between 3% and 8%, and 51 (13%) had scores >8%. Among patients with STS scores between 3% and 8%, 20 (7.8%) versus 18 (7.1%) patients had died up to 30 days (hazard ratio: 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.58 to 2.15, p = 0.74) and 42 (16.5%) versus 43 (16.9%) patients had died up to 1 year (hazard ratio: 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.57 to 1.42, p = 0.64) after TAVI and SAVR, respectively. Effects of treatment on 1-year mortality were similar across all subgroups except for sex, with some evidence for a beneficial effect of TAVI in women but not in men (test for interaction p = 0.024).

Conclusions: Cumulative all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year was similar among propensity-score matched TAVI and SAVR patients at intermediate surgical risk. (Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation [SURTAVI]; NCT01586910).

Citing Articles

WIN Gulf TAVR Registry: Describing Sex Differences in Patient Characteristics, Prognosis, and Outcomes.

Alasnag M, Alanazi N, Al-Shaikh S, Almerri K, Almoghairi A, Alenezi A J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 1(6):100509.

PMID: 39132359 PMC: 11307566. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100509.


Clinical outcomes of the Myval transcatheter heart valve system in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: a two-year follow-up observational study.

Kilic T, Ielasi A, Ninios V, Korkmaz L, Panagiotakos D, Yerlikaya G Arch Med Sci. 2024; 20(2):410-419.

PMID: 38757027 PMC: 11094825. DOI: 10.5114/aoms/176937.


Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With vs Without a Preoperative Heart Team Assessment.

Rodighiero J, Alakhtar A, Baker N, Zgheib A, de Varennes B, Lachapelle K CJC Open. 2023; 5(1):24-34.

PMID: 36700182 PMC: 9869348. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.10.003.


Effect of Native Aortic Leaflet Geometry Modification on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Neo-sinus and Aortic Sinus Flow: An In-vitro Study.

Ncho B, Kohli K, Sadri V, Yoganathan A Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2022; 14(2):182-193.

PMID: 36357649 DOI: 10.1007/s13239-022-00647-x.


Efficacy and Safety of Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-to-Intermediate-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Lou Y, Gao Y, Yu Y, Li Y, Xi Z, Swe K Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020; 7:590975.

PMID: 33304932 PMC: 7701058. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.590975.