» Articles » PMID: 23701308

Is There a Recovery of Decision-making Function After Frontal Lobe Damage? A Study Using Alternative Versions of the Iowa Gambling Task

Overview
Publisher Routledge
Date 2013 May 25
PMID 23701308
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a previous study, we examined whether frontal patients with impaired decision making on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) would recover over time if retested on the IGT. However, a major limitation of repeated administration of the IGT is practice effects, where control participants show improvement with retesting. Therefore, the primary goal of this study was to design two alternative versions of the IGT to eliminate practice effects. We found that control participants did not show improvement in performance across the different versions of the task, thus reflecting success in our attempt to design alternative versions of the IGT. Compared to control participants, patients with damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) performed worse on all three versions of the IGT, even after controlling for age, sex, and education. The development of alternative versions of the IGT provides a valuable tool for clinicians and researchers to utilize the IGT as a way to track how the decision-making abilities of patients change over time. Additionally, these results are consistent with findings from the original studies using the IGT with patients with damage to the vmPFC, which showed that decision-making impairments do not recover over time.

Citing Articles

Age-group differences in trust-related decision-making and learning.

Horta M, Shoenfelt A, Lighthall N, Perez E, Frazier I, Heemskerk A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):68.

PMID: 38167997 PMC: 10762071. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50500-x.


Cognitive chicken or the emotional egg? How reconceptualizing decision-making by integrating cognition and emotion can improve task psychometrics and clinical utility.

Buelow M, Moore S, Kowalsky J, Okdie B Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1254179.

PMID: 38034301 PMC: 10687164. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1254179.


Patients on the psychosis spectrum employ an alternate brain network to engage in complex decision-making.

Ramchandran K, Fiedorowicz J, Chen Z, Bu Y, Bechara A, Andreasen N PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0238774.

PMID: 32915832 PMC: 7485831. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238774.


Unilateral parietal brain injury increases risk-taking on a rat gambling task.

Ozga-Hess J, Whirtley C, OHearn C, Pechacek K, Vonder Haar C Exp Neurol. 2020; 327:113217.

PMID: 32014440 PMC: 7161076. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113217.


Executive (dys)function after traumatic brain injury: special considerations for behavioral pharmacology.

Ozga J, Povroznik J, Engler-Chiurazzi E, Vonder Haar C Behav Pharmacol. 2018; 29(7):617-637.

PMID: 30215621 PMC: 6155367. DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000430.


References
1.
Krenk L, Rasmussen L, Siersma V, Kehlet H . Short-term practice effects and variability in cognitive testing in a healthy elderly population. Exp Gerontol. 2012; 47(6):432-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.03.011. View

2.
Malloy-Diniz L, Fuentes D, Leite W, Correa H, Bechara A . Impulsive behavior in adults with attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: characterization of attentional, motor and cognitive impulsiveness. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007; 13(4):693-8. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617707070889. View

3.
Buelow M, Suhr J . Construct validity of the Iowa Gambling Task. Neuropsychol Rev. 2009; 19(1):102-14. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-009-9083-4. View

4.
Manes F, Sahakian B, Clark L, Rogers R, Antoun N, Aitken M . Decision-making processes following damage to the prefrontal cortex. Brain. 2002; 125(Pt 3):624-39. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf049. View

5.
Torralva T, Kipps C, Hodges J, Clark L, Bekinschtein T, Roca M . The relationship between affective decision-making and theory of mind in the frontal variant of fronto-temporal dementia. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 45(2):342-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.031. View