» Articles » PMID: 23700009

Significance, Truth and Proof of P Values: Reminders About Common Misconceptions Regarding Null Hypothesis Significance Testing

Overview
Journal Qual Life Res
Date 2013 May 24
PMID 23700009
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles

Structural Foot Characteristics in People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis: Cross-Sectional Findings From the Clinical Assessment Study of the Foot.

Lithgow M, Buldt A, Munteanu S, Marshall M, Thomas M, Peat G Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023; 76(2):225-230.

PMID: 37563733 PMC: 11497243. DOI: 10.1002/acr.25217.


Problems and alternatives of testing significance using null hypothesis and -value in food research.

Choi W Food Sci Biotechnol. 2023; :1-9.

PMID: 37363053 PMC: 10227784. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-023-01348-4.


When and How to Interpret Null Results in NIBS: A Taxonomy Based on Prior Expectations and Experimental Design.

de Graaf T, Sack A Front Neurosci. 2019; 12:915.

PMID: 30618550 PMC: 6297282. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00915.


Misconceptions of the p-value among Chilean and Italian Academic Psychologists.

Badenes-Ribera L, Frias-Navarro D, Iotti B, Bonilla-Campos A, Longobardi C Front Psychol. 2016; 7:1247.

PMID: 27602007 PMC: 4993781. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01247.

References
1.
Revicki D, Hays R, Cella D, Sloan J . Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61(2):102-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012. View

2.
Fayers P . The scales were highly correlated: P = 0.0001. Qual Life Res. 2008; 17(5):651-2. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-008-9351-4. View

3.
Nickerson R . Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychol Methods. 2000; 5(2):241-301. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.5.2.241. View

4.
Glaser D . The controversy of significance testing: misconceptions and alternatives. Am J Crit Care. 1999; 8(5):291-6. View

5.
Norman G, Sloan J, Wyrwich K . Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003; 41(5):582-92. DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C. View