» Articles » PMID: 23697613

Usefulness of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in Evaluating Response to Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non Small-cell Lung Cancer: a Prospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2013 May 24
PMID 23697613
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: High serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are an independent prognostic factor for recurrence and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its role as a predictive marker of treatment response has not been widely characterized.

Methods: 180 patients with advanced NSCLC (stage IIIB or Stage IV), who had an elevated CEA serum level (>10 ng/ml) at baseline and who had no more than one previous chemotherapy regimen, were included. CEA levels were measured after two treatment cycles of platinum based chemotherapy (93%) or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (7%). We evaluate the change in serum CEA levels and the association with response measured by RECIST criteria.

Results: After two chemotherapy cycles, the patients who achieved an objective response (OR, 28.3%) had a reduction of CEA levels of 55.6% (95%CI [box drawings light horizontal]64.3 to [box drawings light horizontal]46.8) compared to its basal level, with an area under the ROC curve (AURC) of 0.945 (95%CI 0.91-0.99), and a sensitivity and specificity of 90.2 and 89.9%, respectively, for a CEA reduction of ≥14%. Patients that achieved a decrease in CEA levels ≥14% presented an overall response in 78% of cases, stable disease in 20.3% and progression in 1.7%, while patients that did not attain a reduction ≥14% had an overall response of 4.1%, stable disease of 63.6% and progression of 32.2% (p < 0.001). Patients with stable (49.4%) and progressive disease (22.2%) had an increase of CEA levels of 9.4% (95%CI 1.5-17.3) and 87.5% (95%CI 60.9-114) from baseline, respectively (p < 0.001). The AURC for progressive disease was 0.911 (95%CI 0.86-0.961), with sensitivity and specificity of 85 and 15%, respectively, for a CEA increase of ≥18%. PFS was longer in patients with a ≥14% reduction in CEA (8.7 vs. 5.1 months, p < 0.001). Neither reduction of CEA nor OR were predictive of OS.

Conclusions: A CEA level reduction is a sensitive and specific marker of OR, as well as a sensitive indicator for progression to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC who had an elevated CEA at baseline and had received no more than one chemotherapy regimen. A 14% decrease in CEA levels is associated with a better PFS.

Citing Articles

Prognostic Impact of the Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level after Curative Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Tsukamoto R, Sugimoto K, Ii Y, Irie T, Kawaguchi M, Kobari A J Anus Rectum Colon. 2025; 9(1):69-78.

PMID: 39882227 PMC: 11772802. DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2024-035.


Assessment of serum tumor markers CEA, CA-125, and CA19-9 as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer management.

Strum S, Vincent M, Gipson M, McArthur E, Breadner D Oncotarget. 2024; 15:381-388.

PMID: 38870072 PMC: 11174826. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28566.


Targeted treatments after chemoradiotherapy failure in a patient with relapsed, advanced non‑small cell lung cancer with on‑therapy circulating tumor biomarker monitoring: A case report.

Bi Y, Xia C, Zhang X, Liu H Oncol Lett. 2023; 26(3):407.

PMID: 37600327 PMC: 10436159. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.13993.


Different nodal upstaging rates and prognoses for patients with clinical T1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma classified according to the presence of solid components in the lung and mediastinal windows.

Zhang C, Luan K, Li S, Wang Z, Chen S, Zhang W J Thorac Dis. 2023; 15(7):3612-3626.

PMID: 37559610 PMC: 10407531. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-18.


Current Methods for Identifying Plasma Membrane Proteins as Cancer Biomarkers.

de Jong E, Kocer A Membranes (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37103836 PMC: 10142483. DOI: 10.3390/membranes13040409.


References
1.
Foa P, Fornier M, Miceli R, Seregni E, Santambrogio L, Nosotti M . Tumour markers CEA, NSE, SCC, TPA and CYFRA 21.1 in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2000; 19(4C):3613-8. View

2.
Brundage M, Davies D, Mackillop W . Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer: a decade of progress. Chest. 2002; 122(3):1037-57. DOI: 10.1378/chest.122.3.1037. View

3.
Schiller J, Harrington D, Belani C, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J . Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(2):92-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa011954. View

4.
Paesmans M, Sculier J, Libert P, Bureau G, Dabouis G, Thiriaux J . Response to chemotherapy has predictive value for further survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: 10 years experience of the European Lung Cancer Working Party. Eur J Cancer. 1998; 33(14):2326-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00325-0. View

5.
Erasmus J, Gladish G, Broemeling L, Sabloff B, Truong M, Herbst R . Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(13):2574-82. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.144. View