» Articles » PMID: 23692969

Host Response to Cuckoo Song is Predicted by the Future Risk of Brood Parasitism

Overview
Journal Front Zool
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2013 May 23
PMID 23692969
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Risk assessment occurs over different temporal and spatial scales and is selected for when individuals show an adaptive response to a threat. Here, we test if birds respond to the threat of brood parasitism using the acoustical cues of brood parasites in the absence of visual stimuli. We broadcast the playback of song of three brood parasites (Chalcites cuckoo species) and a sympatric non-parasite (striated thornbill, Acanthiza lineata) in the territories of superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) during the peak breeding period and opportunistic breeding period. The three cuckoo species differ in brood parasite prevalence and the probability of detection by the host, which we used to rank the risk of parasitism (high risk, moderate risk, low risk).

Results: Host birds showed the strongest response to the threat of cuckoo parasitism in accordance with the risk of parasitism. Resident wrens had many alarm calls and close and rapid approach to the playback speaker that was broadcasting song of the high risk brood parasite (Horsfield's bronze-cuckoo, C. basalis) across the year (peak and opportunistic breeding period), some response to the moderate risk brood parasite (shining bronze-cuckoo, C. lucidus) during the peak breeding period, and the weakest response to the low risk brood parasite (little bronze-cuckoo, C. minutillus). Playback of the familiar control stimulus in wren territories evoked the least response.

Conclusion: Host response to the threat of cuckoo parasitism was assessed using vocal cues of the cuckoo and was predicted by the risk of future parasitism.

Citing Articles

Reactions of wintering passerines to male calls of the European cuckoo Cuculus canorus.

Tryjanowski P, Golawski A, Jankowiak L, Moller A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14204.

PMID: 38902276 PMC: 11189894. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64270-7.


When aggressiveness could be too risky: linking personality traits and predator response in superb fairy-wrens.

Bilby J, Colombelli-Negrel D, Katsis A, Kleindorfer S PeerJ. 2022; 10:e14011.

PMID: 36193436 PMC: 9526405. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14011.


Female Cuckoo Calls Deceive Their Hosts by Evoking Nest-Leaving Behavior: Variation under Different Levels of Parasitism.

Wang J, Ma L, Chen X, Yang C Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(15).

PMID: 35953979 PMC: 9367515. DOI: 10.3390/ani12151990.


Female in-nest attendance predicts the number of ectoparasites in Darwin's finch species.

Kleindorfer S, Common L, OConnor J, Garcia-Loor J, Katsis A, Dudaniec R Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1965):20211668.

PMID: 34905711 PMC: 8670954. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1668.


Specific responses of cuckoo hosts to different alarm signals according to breeding stage: a test of the offspring value hypothesis.

Wang J, Yang C Curr Zool. 2021; 66(6):649-655.

PMID: 33391364 PMC: 7769587. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoaa021.


References
1.
Hauber M, Russo S, Sherman P . A password for species recognition in a brood-parasitic bird. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1471):1041-8. PMC: 1088706. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1617. View

2.
Grim T . Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host. Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 274(1608):373-81. PMC: 1702381. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3731. View

3.
Igic B, Cassey P, Grim T, Greenwood D, Moskat C, Rutila J . A shared chemical basis of avian host-parasite egg colour mimicry. Proc Biol Sci. 2011; 279(1731):1068-76. PMC: 3267149. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1718. View

4.
Sato N, Tokue K, Noske R, Mikami O, Ueda K . Evicting cuckoo nestlings from the nest: a new anti-parasitism behaviour. Biol Lett. 2009; 6(1):67-9. PMC: 2817244. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0540. View

5.
Moller A, Antonov A, Stokke B, Fossoy F, Moksnes A, Roskaft E . Isolation by time and habitat and coexistence of distinct host races of the common cuckoo. J Evol Biol. 2011; 24(3):676-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02202.x. View