» Articles » PMID: 23691005

Neighborhood Disadvantage, Neighborhood Safety and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in African Americans: Biosocial Associations in the Jackson Heart Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 May 22
PMID 23691005
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We examined associations between neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, perceived neighborhood safety and cardiometabolic risk factors, adjusting for health behaviors and socioeconomic status (SES) among African Americans.

Methods: Study participants were non-diabetic African Americans (n = 3,909) in the baseline examination (2000-2004) of the Jackson Heart Study. We measured eight risk factors: the metabolic syndrome, its five components, insulin resistance and cardiovascular inflammation. We assessed neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage with US Census 2000 data. We assessed perceived neighborhood safety, health behaviors and SES via survey. We used generalized estimating equations to estimate associations with a random intercept model for neighborhood effects.

Results: After adjustment for health behaviors and SES, neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with the metabolic syndrome in women (PR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01, 1.27). Lack of perceived safety was associated with elevated glucose (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.03, 1.80) and waist circumference (PR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02, 1.11) among women, and with elevated glucose (PR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02, 1.66) and insulin resistance (PR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08, 1.46) among men.

Conclusions: Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and perceived safety should be considered as targets for intervention to reduce cardiometabolic risks among African Americans.

Citing Articles

Neighborhood disorder and social cohesion: A longitudinal investigation of links with maternal cardiometabolic risk one year postpartum.

Cha L, Montoya A, Dunkel Schetter C, Sumner J J Psychosom Res. 2024; 189():112012.

PMID: 39700651 PMC: 11750603. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.112012.


Longitudinal Exposure to Neighborhood Concentrated Poverty Contributes to Differences in Adiposity in Midlife Women.

Schiff M, Barinas-Mitchell E, Brooks M, Mair C, Mendez D, Naimi A J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024; 33(10):1393-1403.

PMID: 38946622 PMC: 11564682. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.1156.


Contributors to Early Mortality in African Americans, the Jackson Heart Study.

Brooks K, Ommerborn M, Brewer L, Sims M, Correa A, Tajeu G Ethn Dis. 2024; 33(2-3):98-107.

PMID: 38845739 PMC: 11145729. DOI: 10.18865/ed.33.2-3.098.


Influence of Socioeconomic Status on the Association Between Pregnancy Complications and Premature Coronary Artery Disease: Linking Three Cohorts.

Khoja A, Andraweera P, Tavella R, Gill T, Dekker G, Roberts C Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024; 5(1):120-131.

PMID: 38404672 PMC: 10890942. DOI: 10.1089/whr.2023.0092.


Associations between dimensions of the social environment and cardiometabolic risk factors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abreu T, Mackenbach J, Heuvelman F, Schoonmade L, Beulens J SSM Popul Health. 2023; 25:101559.

PMID: 38148999 PMC: 10749911. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101559.


References
1.
Augustin T, Glass T, James B, Schwartz B . Neighborhood psychosocial hazards and cardiovascular disease: the Baltimore Memory Study. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(9):1664-70. PMC: 2509598. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.125138. View

2.
Hall W, Clark L, Wenger N, Wright Jr J, Kumanyika S, Watson K . The Metabolic Syndrome in African Americans: a review. Ethn Dis. 2003; 13(4):414-28. View

3.
Rehkopf D, Krieger N, Coull B, Berkman L . Biologic risk markers for coronary heart disease: nonlinear associations with income. Epidemiology. 2009; 21(1):38-46. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30b89. View

4.
Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T, Forsen B, Lahti K, Nissen M . Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24(4):683-9. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.4.683. View

5.
Fleury J, Lee S . The social ecological model and physical activity in African American women. Am J Community Psychol. 2006; 37(1-2):129-40. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-005-9002-7. View