» Articles » PMID: 23689913

Megaprosthetic Reconstruction for Periprosthetic or Highly Comminuted Fractures of the Hip and Knee

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 May 22
PMID 23689913
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To present the experience of a tertiary referral hospital in the management of a case series with hip or knee fractures by using modular megaprosthesis.

Patients And Methods: Seventeen consecutive patients with highly comminuted fractures of the knee (n = 2), periprosthetic fractures of knee (n = 10) or hip (n = 5) were included. Fractures were managed with modular megaprosthesis (including total hip in 2 cases). Postoperative complications like infection and instability and outcome measures like return to previous mobility and living were recorded.

Results: The mean age at time of surgery was 77 years (25-91), and mean follow-up was 44 months (13-98). We had no intra-operative complications. There were 3 deep periprosthetic infections, 1 hip and 2 knee. In the hip group, including total femur patients, we had 2 dislocations (2/7), both managed with closed reduction. No aseptic loosening was seen. 15/17 patients regained walking ability, and 16 were discharged to independent living. Nine patients have died at the time of follow-up.

Conclusions: In these often old and physically compromised patients with highly comminuted fractures or complicated periprosthetic fractures, modular megaprosthesis could be a good surgical option. It can provide immediate stability and allow early mobilization.

Citing Articles

Characteristics and Epidemiology of Megaprostheses Infections: A Systematic Review.

Cianni L, Taccari F, Bocchi M, Micheli G, Sangiorgi F, Ziranu A Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(13).

PMID: 38998818 PMC: 11241048. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12131283.


Knee Arthrodesis Using Dual-Plate Construct is Following Failed Distal Femur Megaprosthesis-A Case Report.

Tripathy S, Varghese P, Khan S, Mishra N, Jain M J Orthop Case Rep. 2024; 14(3):124-129.

PMID: 38560321 PMC: 10976545. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i03.4314.


Megaprosthetic replacement in complex distal humerus fractures in elderly patients: a case series.

Caredda M, Cianni L, De Fazio A, Ziranu A, Vitiello R, Maccauro G J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):53.

PMID: 38212796 PMC: 10782750. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04465-2.


Proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic conditions: a systematic review on current outcomes.

Di Martino A, Pederiva D, Bordini B, Di Carlo G, Panciera A, Geraci G J Orthop Traumatol. 2022; 23(1):18.

PMID: 35348913 PMC: 8964877. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-022-00632-z.


Survivorship and clinical outcomes of proximal femoral replacement in non-neoplastic primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Mancino F, Di Matteo V, Mocini F, Cacciola G, Malerba G, Perisano C BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(Suppl 2):933.

PMID: 34749680 PMC: 8576938. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04711-w.


References
1.
Brady O, Garbuz D, Masri B, Duncan C . Classification of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30(2):215-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70076-6. View

2.
Chandrasekar C, Grimer R, Carter S, Tillman R, Abudu A, Buckley L . Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 91(1):108-12. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.20448. View

3.
Tan P, Tan M . Functional outcome study of mega-endoprosthetic reconstruction in limbs with bone tumour surgery. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2009; 38(3):192-6. View

4.
Heisel C, Kinkel S, Bernd L, Ewerbeck V . Megaprostheses for the treatment of malignant bone tumours of the lower limbs. Int Orthop. 2006; 30(6):452-7. PMC: 3172740. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0207-7. View

5.
Vaishya R, Singh A, Hasija R, Singh A . Treatment of resistant nonunion of supracondylar fractures femur by megaprosthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19(7):1137-40. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1416-1. View