» Articles » PMID: 23689761

Improvement of Research Quality in the Fields of Orthopaedics and Trauma: a Global Perspective

Abstract

The international orthopaedic community aims to achieve the best possible outcome for patient care by constantly modifying surgical techniques and expanding the surgeon's knowledge. These efforts require proper reflection within a setting that necessitates a higher quality standard for global orthopaedic publication. Furthermore, these techniques demand that surgeons acquire information at a rapid rate while enforcing higher standards in research performance. An international consensus exists on how to perform research and what rules should be considered when publishing a scientific paper. Despite this global agreement, in today's "Cross Check Era", too many authors do not give attention to the current standards of systematic research. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to describe these performance standards, the available choices for orthopaedic surgeons and the current learning curve for seasoned teams of researchers and orthopaedic surgeons with more than three decades of experience. These lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the topics that will significantly influence the research development as we arrive at an important globalisation era in orthopaedics and trauma-related research.

Citing Articles

The interobserver reliability of clinical relevance in orthopaedic research.

Strage K, Stacey S, Mauffrey C, Parry J Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022; 33(5):1721-1725.

PMID: 35922640 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03346-4.


Will technology drive orthopaedic surgery in the future?.

Vaishya R, Scarlat M, Iyengar K Int Orthop. 2022; 46(7):1443-1445.

PMID: 35639162 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05454-6.


Middle East Authors' Contribution to the 's Publications in the Past 20 years (2000-2020).

Khalifa A, Haridy M, Khashaim M, Haroon T, Fadle A, Attia A Arthroplast Today. 2022; 14:59-64.

PMID: 35252507 PMC: 8889357. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.01.022.


Rising within the leadership of an orthopaedic society: learning from the presidents.

Thevendran G, Glazebrook M, Eastwood D, Weber K, Kit D, Johari A Int Orthop. 2022; 46(3):443-447.

PMID: 34982195 PMC: 8724003. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05295-9.


Statistical Fragility of Surgical Clinical Trials in Orthopaedic Trauma.

Forrester L, McCormick K, Bonsignore-Opp L, Tedesco L, Baranek E, Jang E J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021; 5(11).

PMID: 34807889 PMC: 8608260. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00197.


References
1.
Wright J . A practical guide to assigning levels of evidence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(5):1128-30. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01380. View

2.
. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992; 268(17):2420-5. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032. View

3.
Ioannidis J . Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005; 2(8):e124. PMC: 1182327. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. View

4.
Rossouw J, Anderson G, Prentice R, LaCroix A, Kooperberg C, Stefanick M . Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002; 288(3):321-33. DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.3.321. View

5.
Okike K, Kocher M, Mehlman C, Heckman J, Bhandari M . Publication bias in orthopaedic research: an analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(3):595-601. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00279. View