Safety and Effectiveness of Percutaneous Sacroplasty: a Single-centre Experience in 58 Consecutive Patients with Tumours or Osteoporotic Insufficient Fractures Treated Under Fluoroscopic Guidance
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To report our experience in percutaneous sacroplasty (PSP) for tumours and insufficiency fractures of the sacrum.
Methods: Single-centre retrospective analysis of 58 consecutive patients who underwent 67 PSPs for intractable pain from sacral tumours (84.5 %) or from osteoporotic fractures (15.5 %). The following data were assessed: visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after the procedure for global pain; short-term (1-month) clinical follow-up using a four-grade patient satisfaction scale (worse, unchanged, mild improvement and significant improvement); modification in analgesics consumption; referred short-term walking mobility. Minor and major complications were systematically assessed.
Results: The mean VAS score was 5.3 ± 2.0 in pre-procedure and 1.7 ± 1.8 in post-procedure. At 1-month follow-up, 34/58 (58.5 %) patients experienced a mild improvement; 15/58 (26 %) presented a significant improvement while 4/58 (7 %) and 5/58 (8.5 %) patients had unchanged or worse pain, respectively. Decreased analgesic consumption was observed in 34 % (20/58) of the patients. Eighty percent of patients with walking limitation experienced improvement, 16 % remained unchanged and 4 % were worse. We noted minor complications in 2/58 patients (3.4 %) and major complications in 2/58 patients (3.4 %).
Conclusion: Percutaneous sacroplasty for metastatic and osteoporotic fractures is a safe and effective technique in terms of pain relief and functional outcome.
Key Points: • Percutaneous sacroplasty provides pain relief and functional improvement for insufficiency sacral fractures. • Percutaneous sacroplasty provides pain relief and function improvement for sacral tumours. • The major complication rate is acceptable (3.4 %), and is higher in sacral tumours. • Posterior wall/cortical sacral bone disruption is not statistically associated with more complications. • However, osteolytic tumours seem to be associated with higher risk of complications.
Nasralla M, Alfalahi A, Hendriks E, Murphy K, Smith R Interv Neuroradiol. 2024; :15910199241282709.
PMID: 39275844 PMC: 11559721. DOI: 10.1177/15910199241282709.
Boeken T, Pouliquen G, Premat K, Benac B, Shotar E, Cormier E Eur Radiol. 2022; 33(4):2605-2611.
PMID: 36378253 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09252-x.
Anterior Transpsoas Approach for Removal of Cement Leakage after Sacroplasty.
Mok J, Strelzow J, L Vallina V, P Zebala L Spine Surg Relat Res. 2022; 6(5):563-568.
PMID: 36348685 PMC: 9605746. DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2021-0097.
Kao F, Hsu Y, Chen T, Liu P, Tu Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1):269.
PMID: 33865421 PMC: 8052704. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02409-2.
Percutaneous Sacroplasty : Effectiveness and Long-Term Outcome Predictors.
Lee J, Lee E, Lee J, Kang Y, Ahn J, Kang H J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020; 63(6):747-756.
PMID: 32455518 PMC: 7671780. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0014.