» Articles » PMID: 23680181

Challenges for Consent and Community Engagement in the Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trial Among School Children in Low Income Settings: Experiences from Kenya

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2013 May 18
PMID 23680181
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There are a number of practical and ethical issues raised in school-based health research, particularly those related to obtaining consent from parents and assent from children. One approach to developing, strengthening, and supporting appropriate consent and assent processes is through community engagement. To date, much of the literature on community engagement in biomedical research has concentrated on community- or hospital-based research, with little documentation, if any, of community engagement in school-based health research. In this paper we discuss our experiences of consent, assent and community engagement in implementing a large school-based cluster randomized trial in rural Kenya.

Methods: Data collected as part of a qualitative study investigating the acceptability of the main trial, focus group discussions with field staff, observations of practice and authors' experiences are used to: 1) highlight the challenges faced in obtaining assent/consent; and 2) strategies taken to try to both protect participant rights (including to refuse and to withdraw) and ensure the success of the trial.

Results: Early meetings with national, district and local level stakeholders were important in establishing their co-operation and support for the project. Despite this support, both practical and ethical challenges were encountered during consenting and assenting procedures. Our strategy for addressing these challenges focused on improving communication and understanding of the trial, and maintaining dialogue with all the relevant stakeholders throughout the study period.

Conclusions: A range of stakeholders within and beyond schools play a key role in school based health trials. Community entry and information dissemination strategies need careful planning from the outset, and with on-going consultation and feedback mechanisms established in order to identify and address concerns as they arise. We believe our experiences, and the ethical and practical issues and dilemmas encountered, will be of interest for others planning to conduct school-based research in Africa.

Trial Registration: National Institute of Health NCT00878007.

Citing Articles

Community-structures that facilitate engagement in health research: Ifakara Health Research Institute-Bagamoyo case study.

Bategereza L, Olotu A, Kamuya D AAS Open Res. 2025; 4:13.

PMID: 40078895 PMC: 11303950. DOI: 10.12688/aasopenres.13187.2.


Models for malaria control optimization-a systematic review.

Ngwafor R, Pokharel S, Aguas R, White L, Shretta R Malar J. 2024; 23(1):295.

PMID: 39363178 PMC: 11448400. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-024-05118-3.


Community engagement in research addressing infectious diseases of poverty in sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative systematic review.

Koricha Z, Abraha Y, Ababulgu S, Abraham G, Morankar S PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(7):e0003167.

PMID: 39008476 PMC: 11249264. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003167.


Targeted Testing and Treatment To Reduce Human Malaria Transmission in High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Review.

Bhamani B, Marti Coma-Cros E, Tusell M, Mithi V, Serra-Casas E, Williams N Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024; 110(4_Suppl):54-64.

PMID: 38471159 PMC: 10993793. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0097.


Perceptions and beliefs of community gatekeepers about genomic risk information in African cleft research.

Oladayo A, Odukoya O, Sule V, Molobe I, Busch T, Akodu B BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):507.

PMID: 38365612 PMC: 10873930. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17987-z.


References
1.
Weijer C, Grimshaw J, Eccles M, McRae A, White A, Brehaut J . The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials. PLoS Med. 2012; 9(11):e1001346. PMC: 3502500. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001346. View

2.
Kerr C, Robinson E, Stevens A, Braunholtz D, Edwards S, Lilford R . Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable?. J Med Ethics. 2004; 30(1):80-4. PMC: 1757143. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2002.001123. View

3.
Brooker S, Kolaczinski J, Gitonga C, Noor A, Snow R . The use of schools for malaria surveillance and programme evaluation in Africa. Malar J. 2009; 8:231. PMC: 2768743. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-231. View

4.
Featherstone K, Donovan J . "Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?" The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 55(5):709-19. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00197-6. View

5.
Weijer C, Grimshaw J, Taljaard M, Binik A, Boruch R, Brehaut J . Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research. Trials. 2011; 12:100. PMC: 3107798. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-100. View