» Articles » PMID: 23677358

Comparison of Functional Outcomes of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Those of Hemiarthroplasty in the Treatment of Cuff-tear Arthropathy: a Matched-pair Analysis

Overview
Date 2013 May 17
PMID 23677358
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Rotator cuff-tear arthropathy has traditionally represented a challenge to the shoulder arthroplasty surgeon. The poor results of conventional total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator-cuff-deficient shoulders due to glenoid component loosening have led to hemiarthroplasty being the traditional preferred surgical option. Recently, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has gained increasing popularity because of a clinical perception of an improved functional outcome, despite the lack of comparative data. The aim of this study was to compare the early functional results of hemiarthroplasty with those of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the management of cuff-tear arthropathy.

Methods: The results of 102 primary hemiarthroplasties for rotator cuff-tear arthropathy were compared with those of 102 reverse shoulder arthroplasties performed for the same diagnosis. Patients were identified from the New Zealand Joint Registry and matched for age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores. Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) collected at six months postoperatively as well as mortality and revision rates were compared between the two groups.

Results: There were fifty-one men and fifty-one women in each group, with a mean age of 71.6 years in the hemiarthroplasty group and 72.6 years in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group. The mean OSS at six months was 31.1 in the hemiarthroplasty group and 37.5 in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group. At the time of follow-up, there were nine revisions in the hemiarthroplasty group and five in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group. No difference in mortality rate was seen between the two groups.

Conclusions: In this unselected population with rotator cuff-tear arthropathy, controlled for age, sex, and ASA score, reverse shoulder arthroplasty resulted in a functional outcome that was superior to that of hemiarthroplasty. Longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm these findings.

Citing Articles

A comparative analysis of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for posterior glenoid wear patterns.

Hardaway A, Renshaw A, Brolin T, Bernholt D, Azar F, Throckmorton T J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025; 61():102868.

PMID: 39816719 PMC: 11731588. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102868.


Predictors of Internal Rotation after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Gibian J, Sokrab R, Hill J, Keener J, Zmistowski B Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023; 11(11):696-703.

PMID: 38058969 PMC: 10697196. DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.68173.3230.


Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture Versus Rotator Cuff Arthropathy.

Maier 2nd S, Prabhat A, Collins J, von Keudell A, Earp B, Zhang D J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023; 7(10).

PMID: 37867245 PMC: 10593265. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00169.


Hemiarthroplasty versus total shoulder arthroplasty in B2 glenoids with an intact rotator cuff: a long-term matched cohort analysis.

Conyer R, Markos J, Marigi E, Cates R, Steinmann S, Sperling J JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023; 3(3):289-294.

PMID: 37588491 PMC: 10426598. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.03.003.


Shoulder replacement: an epidemiological nationwide study from 2009 to 2019.

Longo U, Papalia R, Castagna A, De Salvatore S, Guerra E, Piergentili I BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):889.

PMID: 36180858 PMC: 9526311. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05849-x.