» Articles » PMID: 23673092

Computer-driven Automated Weaning Reduces Weaning Duration in Difficult-to-wean Patients

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 May 16
PMID 23673092
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Weaning difficulties occur in 31% of total intubated patients, and result in prolonged weaning duration. A computer-driven automated weaning system can perform a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) automatically and display a message when the trial is successfully passed. Such a system might have a beneficial effect on difficult-to-wean patients. The aim of this study was to examine whether the computer-driven automated weaning system can accelerate discontinuation of mechanical ventilation and improve outcomes in difficult-to-wean patients.

Methods: This randomized controlled study included 39 difficult-to-wean patients who failed their first spontaneous breathing trial. Before initiating weaning, eligible patients were randomly allocated to wean by computer-driven automated weaning system (CDW group, n = 19) or a physician-controlled local protocol (PW group, n = 20). Weaning duration, defined as the time from inclusion until first extubation, was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were total duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, the number of reintubations, the mortality rate in the ICU, the number of noninvasive ventilations, the number of complications in the ICU, and the number of ventilator-associated pneumonia cases.

Results: The weaning duration was reduced with the computer-driven weaning as compared with the usual protocol (median 29.0 hours vs. 45.5 hours, P = 0.044). Total duration of mechanical ventilation and duration of the ICU stay did not differ between the CDW and PW groups. There was no difference in the number of reintubations between the CDW and PW groups (3 and 4 patients, P = 0.732). The study groups showed comparable numbers of tracheostomy, self-extubations, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and non-invasive ventilation. Mortality in the ICU was similar in the CDW and the PW groups (21.1% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.935).

Conclusion: The computer-driven automated weaning system can reduce weaning duration in difficult-to-wean patients as compared with a physician-controlled weaning protocol.

Citing Articles

Effects of closed loop ventilation on ventilator settings, patient outcomes and ICU staff workloads - a systematic review.

Goossen R, Schultz M, Tschernko E, Chew M, Robba C, Paulus F Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024; 41(6):438-446.

PMID: 38385449 PMC: 11064903. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001972.


Fully automated life support: an implementation and feasibility pilot study in healthy pigs.

Klingert W, Peter J, Thiel C, Thiel K, Rosenstiel W, Klingert K Intensive Care Med Exp. 2018; 6(1):2.

PMID: 29340799 PMC: 5770352. DOI: 10.1186/s40635-018-0168-3.


The optimum timing to wean invasive ventilation for patients with AECOPD or COPD with pulmonary infection.

Song Y, Chen R, Zhan Q, Chen S, Luo Z, Ou J Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016; 11:535-42.

PMID: 27042042 PMC: 4798212. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S96541.


Smart Care™ versus respiratory physiotherapy-driven manual weaning for critically ill adult patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Taniguchi C, Victor E, Pieri T, Henn R, Santana C, Giovanetti E Crit Care. 2015; 19:246.

PMID: 26580673 PMC: 4511442. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0978-6.


Automated versus non-automated weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation for critically ill adults and children: a cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rose L, Schultz M, Cardwell C, Jouvet P, McAuley D, Blackwood B Crit Care. 2015; 19:48.

PMID: 25887887 PMC: 4344786. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0755-6.