» Articles » PMID: 23666411

High-throughput Tetrad Analysis

Overview
Journal Nat Methods
Date 2013 May 14
PMID 23666411
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tetrad analysis has been a gold-standard genetic technique for several decades. Unfortunately, the need to manually isolate, disrupt and space tetrads has relegated its application to small-scale studies and limited its integration with high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies. We have developed a rapid, high-throughput method, called barcode-enabled sequencing of tetrads (BEST), that uses (i) a meiosis-specific GFP fusion protein to isolate tetrads by FACS and (ii) molecular barcodes that are read during genotyping to identify spores derived from the same tetrad. Maintaining tetrad information allows accurate inference of missing genetic markers and full genotypes of missing (and presumably nonviable) individuals. An individual researcher was able to isolate over 3,000 yeast tetrads in 3 h, an output equivalent to that of almost 1 month of manual dissection. BEST is transferable to other microorganisms for which meiotic mapping is significantly more laborious.

Citing Articles

Applications of Programmable Endonucleases in Sequence- and Ligation-Independent Seamless DNA Assembly.

Xiong X, Lu Z, Ma L, Zhai C Biomolecules. 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37509059 PMC: 10377497. DOI: 10.3390/biom13071022.


A method for quantifying sporulation efficiency and isolating meiotic progeny in non-GMO strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Sirr A, Timour M, Cromie G, Tang M, Dudley A Yeast. 2022; 39(6-7):354-362.

PMID: 35706372 PMC: 9357172. DOI: 10.1002/yea.3802.


Chromosome-Wide Characterization of Intragenic Crossover in Shiitake Mushroom, .

Gong W, Shen N, Zhang L, Bian Y, Xiao Y J Fungi (Basel). 2021; 7(12).

PMID: 34947058 PMC: 8704546. DOI: 10.3390/jof7121076.


Computational Inference Software for Tetrad Assembly from Randomly Arrayed Yeast Colonies.

Sakhanenko N, Cromie G, Dudley A, Galas D G3 (Bethesda). 2019; 9(7):2071-2088.

PMID: 31109921 PMC: 6643883. DOI: 10.1534/g3.119.400166.


Rapid Phenotypic and Genotypic Diversification After Exposure to the Oral Host Niche in .

Forche A, Cromie G, Gerstein A, Solis N, Pisithkul T, Srifa W Genetics. 2018; 209(3):725-741.

PMID: 29724862 PMC: 6028260. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301019.


References
1.
Ehrenreich I, Torabi N, Jia Y, Kent J, Martis S, Shapiro J . Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants. Nature. 2010; 464(7291):1039-42. PMC: 2862354. DOI: 10.1038/nature08923. View

2.
Winston F, DOLLARD C . Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C. Yeast. 1995; 11(1):53-5. DOI: 10.1002/yea.320110107. View

3.
Lorenz K, Cohen B . Small- and large-effect quantitative trait locus interactions underlie variation in yeast sporulation efficiency. Genetics. 2012; 192(3):1123-32. PMC: 3522155. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.143107. View

4.
Mancera E, Bourgon R, Brozzi A, Huber W, Steinmetz L . High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature. 2008; 454(7203):479-85. PMC: 2780006. DOI: 10.1038/nature07135. View

5.
Snitkin E, Dudley A, Janse D, Wong K, Church G, Segre D . Model-driven analysis of experimentally determined growth phenotypes for 465 yeast gene deletion mutants under 16 different conditions. Genome Biol. 2008; 9(9):R140. PMC: 2592718. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r140. View