» Articles » PMID: 23661939

Image-guided Fine-needle Aspiration of Retroperitoneal Masses: The Role of the Cytopathologist

Overview
Journal J Cytol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2013 May 11
PMID 23661939
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Retroperitoneal tumors constitute a difficult diagnostic category as they are not easily accessible. The advent of image-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has resolved this problem significantly.

Aims: We present a short study based on guided aspiration of retroperitoneal tumors, in which we have tried to assess the role of image-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology as a tool for pre-operative diagnosis.

Materials And Methods: The study was conducted on patients diagnosed with retroperitoneal masses. FNA was performed under image guidance with the help of ultrasonography and/or computed tomography; smears were prepared and meticulously screened according to a fixed protocol. The results were analyzed to determine sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic efficacy of cytopathological diagnosis using image-guided FNA techniques.

Results: We assessed 38 patients with retroperitoneal masses. In all cases, adequate cellular material was obtained. No major complications were encountered. Statistical analysis was carried out in 35 cases; sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 100% in these cases.

Conclusion: FNA under image guidance should be considered a first-line diagnostic approach for retroperitoneal and other abdominal tumors, although caution should be exercised in case selection. In areas where advanced tests are not available, the cytotechnologist and cytopathologist have a very important role to play in ensuring accurate diagnoses.

Citing Articles

Usefulness of a novel device to divide core needle biopsy specimens in a spatially matched fashion.

Shiraishi T, Inui S, Inoue Y, Saito Y, Taga H, Kaneko M Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):17098.

PMID: 33051506 PMC: 7555856. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74136-3.


CT-guided biopsy of subdiaphragmatic small renal nodule with the coaxial technique using MPR images.

Saba L, Saba F, Fellini F Acta Biomed. 2020; 90(4):426-431.

PMID: 31910166 PMC: 7233787. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i4.7479.


Minimally invasive biopsy in retroperitoneal tumors.

Marcu R, Diaconu C, Constantin T, Socea B, Ionita-Radu F, Mischianu D Exp Ther Med. 2019; 18(6):5016-5020.

PMID: 31798722 PMC: 6880447. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8020.


Update on MR Imaging of cystic retroperitoneal masses.

Nguyen K, Siegelman E, Tu W, Schieda N Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019; 45(10):3172-3183.

PMID: 31501965 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02196-9.


Critical clinical appraisal of the role of computed tomography-guided minimally invasive aspiration cytology in evaluation of retroperitoneal masses.

Das C, Sengupta M, Mukhopadhyay M, Saha A Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2014; 35(1):60-5.

PMID: 25006286 PMC: 4080665. DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.133723.

References
1.
Zamboni G, DOnofrio M, Idili A, Malago R, Iozzia R, Manfrin E . Ultrasound-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration of 545 focal pancreatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(6):1691-5. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2958. View

2.
Pedersen J . Percutaneous puncture guided by ultrasonic multitransducer scanning. J Clin Ultrasound. 1977; 5(3):175-7. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.1870050308. View

3.
Micames C, Jowell P, White R, Paulson E, Nelson R, Morse M . Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 58(5):690-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02009-1. View

4.
KHORSAND D . CARCINOMA WITHIN SOLITARY RENAL CYSTS. J Urol. 1965; 93:440-4. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)63800-X. View

5.
Mondal A, Ghosh E . Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of solid renal masses--a study of 92 cases. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1992; 35(4):333-9. View