Intramolecular Hydrogen-bonding in Aqueous Carbohydrates As a Cause or Consequence of Conformational Preferences: a Molecular Dynamics Study of Cellobiose Stereoisomers
Overview
Affiliations
It is often assumed that intramolecular hydrogen-bonding (H-bonding) exerts a significant influence on the conformational properties of aqueous (bio-)polymers. To discuss this statement, one should, however, distinguish between solvent-exposed and buried H-bonds, and between their respective roles in promoting stability (i.e., as a driving force) and specificity (for which the term steering force is introduced here). In this study, the role of solvent-exposed H-bonding in carbohydrates as a driving or steering force is probed using explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations with local elevation umbrella sampling in the simple context of cellobiose stereoisomers. More specifically, four β(1→4)-linked D-aldohexopyranose disaccharides are considered, which present a different stereochemisty of the potentially H-bonding groups neighboring the glycosidic linkage. Although the epimerization may largely alter the intramolecular trans-glycosidic H-bonding pattern, it is found to have only very limited influence on the Ramachandran free-energy map of the disaccharide, a loss of intramolecular H-bonding being merely compensated for by an enhancement of the interaction with the solvent molecules. This finding suggests that solvent-exposed trans-glycosidic H-bonding (and in particular the HO'(3)→O5 H-bond) is not the cause of the 21-helical secondary structure characteristic of cellooligosaccharides, but rather the opportunistic consequence of a sterically and stereoelectronically dictated conformational preference. In other words, for these compounds, solvent-exposed H-bonding appears to represent a minor (possibly adverse) conformational driving as well as steering force.
Influence of Selective Deoxyfluorination on the Molecular Structure of Type-2 -Acetyllactosamine.
Kurfirt M, cervenkova Stastna L, Dracinsky M, Pohl R, Cisarova I, Sykora J J Org Chem. 2024; 89(17):11875-11890.
PMID: 39178339 PMC: 11382267. DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.4c00879.
Lutsyk V, Wolski P, Plazinski W J Chem Theory Comput. 2024; 20(14):6350-6368.
PMID: 38985993 PMC: 11270825. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00543.
Varghese C, Jaladeep A, Sekhar A J Am Chem Soc. 2024; 146(6):3825-3835.
PMID: 38293947 PMC: 7615893. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c10982.
Understanding Nanocellulose-Water Interactions: Turning a Detriment into an Asset.
Solhi L, Guccini V, Heise K, Solala I, Niinivaara E, Xu W Chem Rev. 2023; 123(5):1925-2015.
PMID: 36724185 PMC: 9999435. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00611.
O-Methylation in Carbohydrates: An NMR and MD Simulation Study with Application to Methylcellulose.
Ruda A, Widmalm G, Wohlert J J Phys Chem B. 2021; 125(43):11967-11979.
PMID: 34704449 PMC: 8573740. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c07293.