» Articles » PMID: 23660249

Mechanical Modulation of Nascent Stem Cell Lineage Commitment in Tissue Engineering Scaffolds

Overview
Journal Biomaterials
Date 2013 May 11
PMID 23660249
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Taking inspiration from tissue morphogenesis in utero, this study tests the concept of using tissue engineering scaffolds as delivery devices to modulate emergent structure-function relationships at early stages of tissue genesis. We report on the use of a combined computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling, advanced manufacturing methods, and experimental fluid mechanics (micro-piv and strain mapping) for the prospective design of tissue engineering scaffold geometries that deliver spatially resolved mechanical cues to stem cells seeded within. When subjected to a constant magnitude global flow regime, the local scaffold geometry dictates the magnitudes of mechanical stresses and strains experienced by a given cell, and in a spatially resolved fashion, similar to patterning during morphogenesis. In addition, early markers of mesenchymal stem cell lineage commitment relate significantly to the local mechanical environment of the cell. Finally, by plotting the range of stress-strain states for all data corresponding to nascent cell lineage commitment (95% CI), we begin to "map the mechanome", defining stress-strain states most conducive to targeted cell fates. In sum, we provide a library of reference mechanical cues that can be delivered to cells seeded on tissue engineering scaffolds to guide target tissue phenotypes in a temporally and spatially resolved manner. Knowledge of these effects allows for prospective scaffold design optimization using virtual models prior to prototyping and clinical implementation. Finally, this approach enables the development of next generation scaffolds cum delivery devices for genesis of complex tissues with heterogenous properties, e.g., organs, joints or interface tissues such as growth plates.

Citing Articles

De novo identification of universal cell mechanics gene signatures.

Urbanska M, Ge Y, Winzi M, Abuhattum S, Ali S, Herbig M Elife. 2025; 12.

PMID: 39960760 PMC: 11832173. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.87930.


Stem cell mechanoadaptation. I. Effect of microtubule stabilization and volume changing stresses on cytoskeletal remodeling.

Putra V, Kilian K, Knothe Tate M APL Bioeng. 2025; 9(1):016102.

PMID: 39801500 PMC: 11719676. DOI: 10.1063/5.0231273.


Shape-memory responses compared between random and aligned electrospun fibrous mats.

Wang X, Zhang Z, Qin C, Guo X, Zhang Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1130315.

PMID: 36777255 PMC: 9909598. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1130315.


Biomechanical, biophysical and biochemical modulators of cytoskeletal remodelling and emergent stem cell lineage commitment.

Putra V, Kilian K, Knothe Tate M Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):75.

PMID: 36658332 PMC: 9852586. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-04320-w.


Mapping the Mechanome-A Protocol for Simultaneous Live Imaging and Quantitative Analysis of Cell Mechanoadaptation and Ingression.

Putra V, Jalilian I, Campbell M, Poole K, Whan R, Tomasetig F Bio Protoc. 2021; 9(23):e3439.

PMID: 33654934 PMC: 7853984. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3439.


References
1.
Ovsianikov A, Chichkov B . Three-dimensional microfabrication by two-photon polymerization technique. Methods Mol Biol. 2012; 868:311-25. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-764-4_19. View

2.
Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T . Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997; 275(5302):964-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5302.964. View

3.
Truscello S, Schrooten J, Van Oosterwyck H . A computational tool for the upscaling of regular scaffolds during in vitro perfusion culture. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2011; 17(6):619-30. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2010.0647. View

4.
Hidalgo-Bastida L, Thirunavukkarasu S, Griffiths S, Cartmell S, Naire S . Modeling and design of optimal flow perfusion bioreactors for tissue engineering applications. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011; 109(4):1095-9. DOI: 10.1002/bit.24368. View

5.
Hutmacher D, Sittinger M, Risbud M . Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems. Trends Biotechnol. 2004; 22(7):354-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.05.005. View