» Articles » PMID: 23652524

Elective Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request

Overview
Journal JAMA
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 May 9
PMID 23652524
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Some pregnant women prefer cesarean delivery and request it without maternal or fetal indication rather than proceeding with a plan for vaginal delivery.

Objective: To review approaches for counseling women who ask for cesarean delivery without maternal or fetal indication (known as cesarean delivery on maternal request [CDMR]).

Evidence Review: An Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality evidence report of studies published after 1990, a 2006 National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference report, and published literature were examined.

Findings: The prevalence of CDMR in the United States is not precisely known but probably occurs in less than 3% of all deliveries. Most practicing obstetricians have received requests for CDMR from patients. Compared with a plan for vaginal delivery, CDMR may be associated with lower rates of hemorrhage, maternal incontinence, and rare but serious neonatal outcomes. However, CDMR is associated with a higher risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity. Adverse consequences of CDMR may be manifested only in future pregnancies. Repeated cesarean deliveries have higher rates of operative complications, placental abnormalities such as placenta previa and accreta, and consequent gravid hysterectomy.

Conclusions And Relevance: There is no immediate expectation for CDMR to reduce the health risks of mothers or infants. Accordingly, counseling and decisions regarding CDMR should be made after considering a woman's full reproductive plans.

Citing Articles

Cesarean Delivery Upon Request in Pregnancies Following Vaginal Delivery: A Nationwide Study.

Jung Y, Wi W, Cho K, Hong S, Oh M, Cho G J Korean Med Sci. 2025; 39(50):e318.

PMID: 39742875 PMC: 11685277. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e318.


Caesarean delivery on maternal request: the perspective of the postpartum women.

Muhandule C, Benetti C, Fogulin L, Bento S, Amaral E BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):257.

PMID: 38594625 PMC: 11003158. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06464-5.


The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia.

Tawfeeq N, Hilal F, Alharbi N, Alowid F, Almaghrabi R, Alsubhi R Cureus. 2023; 15(9):e44972.

PMID: 37822429 PMC: 10563372. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44972.


Maternal and neonatal morbidities associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor around term.

Moon H, Lee J, Kim E Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022; 66(1):11-19.

PMID: 36530057 PMC: 9877469. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.22248.


Caesarean Section on Maternal Request-Ethical and Juridic Issues: A Narrative Review.

Sorrentino F, Greco F, Palieri T, Vasciaveo L, Stabile G, Carlucci S Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(9).

PMID: 36143932 PMC: 9506057. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58091255.