» Articles » PMID: 23648048

Associations of Neighborhood Characteristics with Active Park Use: an Observational Study in Two Cities in the USA and Belgium

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2013 May 8
PMID 23648048
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Public parks can be an important setting for physical activity promotion, but to increase park use and the activity levels of park users, the crucial attributes related to active park use need to be defined. Not only user characteristics and structural park attributes, but also characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood are important to examine. Furthermore, internationally comparable studies are needed, to find out if similar intervention strategies might be effective worldwide. The main aim of this study was to examine whether the overall number of park visitors and their activity levels depend on study site, neighborhood walkability and neighborhood income.

Methods: Data were collected in 20 parks in Ghent, Belgium and San Diego, USA. Two trained observers systematically coded park characteristics using the Environmental Assessment of Public Recreation Spaces (EAPRS) tool, and park user characteristics using the System for Observing Play and recreation in Communities (SOPARC) tool. Multilevel multiple regression models were conducted in MLwiN 2.25.

Results: In San Diego parks, activity levels of park visitors and number of vigorously active visitors were higher than in Ghent, while the number of visitors walking and the overall number of park visitors were lower. Neighborhood walkability was positively associated with the overall number of visitors, the number of visitors walking, number of sedentary visitors and mean activity levels of visitors. Neighborhood income was positively associated with the overall number of visitors, but negatively with the number of visitors being vigorously active.

Conclusions: Neighborhood characteristics are important to explain park use. Neighborhood walkability-related attributes should be taken into account when promoting the use of existing parks or creating new parks. Because no strong differences were found between parks in high- and low-income neighborhoods, it seems that promoting park use might be a promising strategy to increase physical activity in low-income populations, known to be at higher risk for overweight and obesity.

Citing Articles

Area Socioeconomic Status is Associated with Refusal of Recommended Surgery in Patients with Metastatic Bone and Joint Disease.

Mani K, Kleinbart E, Schlumprecht A, Golding R, Akioyamen N, Song H Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(8):4882-4893.

PMID: 38861205 PMC: 11236857. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15299-5.


Greenspaces and Health: Scoping Review of studies in Europe.

Banwell N, Michel S, Senn N Public Health Rev. 2024; 45:1606863.

PMID: 38831866 PMC: 11144923. DOI: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1606863.


How Much Did Urban Park Use Change under the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Comparative Study of Summertime Park Use in 2019 and 2020 in Edinburgh, Scotland.

Deniz Kiraz L, Ward Thompson C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(21).

PMID: 37947559 PMC: 10648880. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20217001.


Change of urban park usage as a response to the COVID-19 global pandemic.

Zhao H, Mailloux B, Cook E, Culligan P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19324.

PMID: 37935778 PMC: 10630328. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46745-1.


Neighborhood Built Environment Impacts Park Use of Diverse, Low-Income Mothers With Their Children.

Mullenbach L, Larson L, Floyd M, Marquet O, Huang J, Alberico C J Healthy Eat Act Living. 2023; 1(3):108-120.

PMID: 37799194 PMC: 10550036.


References
1.
Timperio A, Giles-Corti B, Crawford D, Andrianopoulos N, Ball K, Salmon J . Features of public open spaces and physical activity among children: findings from the CLAN study. Prev Med. 2008; 47(5):514-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.07.015. View

2.
Brownson R, Baker E, Housemann R, Brennan L, Bacak S . Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(12):1995-2003. PMC: 1446921. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.12.1995. View

3.
Cohen D, Setodji C, Evenson K, Ward P, Lapham S, Hillier A . How much observation is enough? Refining the administration of SOPARC. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8(8):1117-23. PMC: 3689589. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.8.8.1117. View

4.
Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, Sallis J, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I . Neighborhood SES and walkability are related to physical activity behavior in Belgian adults. Prev Med. 2009; 50 Suppl 1:S74-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.027. View

5.
Mowen A, Orsega-Smith E, Payne L, Ainsworth B, Godbey G . The role of park proximity and social support in shaping park visitation, physical activity, and perceived health among older adults. J Phys Act Health. 2007; 4(2):167-79. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.4.2.167. View