Article: Ultrasound does not shorten the duration of procedure but provides a faster sensory and motor block onset in comparison to nerve stimulator in infraclavicular brachial plexus block

Background: Infraclaviculr Brachial plexus (ICBP) block is useful for upper extremity surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the ultrasound (US) technique with the nerve stimulation (NS) technique in their success rates and times to perform ICBP block.

Methods: 60 patients undergoing surgery of the upper limb were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 30 per group). Group 1; US, and Group 2; NS. Procedure time (including time for initial ultrasound examination), the success rate and the onset time of sensory and motor blockade were assessed.

Results: The time needed to perform the ICBP block is similar in both groups (220 seconds ± 130 in US group versus 281 ± 134 seconds in NS group; P = 0.74). The success rate of all the nerve blocks in the US group was 100%. The success rate in the NS group was 73.3%, 76.7%, 76.7% and 100% for radial, ulnar, medial, and musculocutaneous nerve, respectively. A significantly faster onset of sensory block for the radial, ulnar, median, musculocutaneous, and the four nerves considered together were observed. The onset of motor block for the radial, ulnar, and medial nerves was faster in the US group. However, the onset of motor block for the musculocutaneous nerve and the four nerves considered together was comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block is a significantly efficacious method with faster onset but similar procedure time compared to the nerve stimulation technique.

Citing Articles

Role of positioning posterior cord on coracoid approach brachial plexus block guided by nerve stimulator: Compared with guided by ultrasound.

He W, Liu Z, Wu Z, Liu W, Sun H, Yang X Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(45):e8428.

PMID: 29137028 PMC: 5690721. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008428.

The technique comparison of brachial plexus blocks by ultrasound guided with blocks by nerve stimulator guided.

Liu G, Chen Z, Jia H, Dai Z, Zhang X Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(9):16699-703.

PMID: 26629206 PMC: 4659094.

Ultrasound guidance for upper and lower limb blocks.

Lewis S, Price A, Walker K, McGrattan K, Smith A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (9):CD006459.

PMID: 26361135 PMC: 6465072. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006459.pub3.

References

1.

Lavoie J, Martin R, Tetrault J, Cote D, Colas M . Axillary plexus block using a peripheral nerve stimulator: single or multiple injections. Can J Anaesth. 1992; 39(6):583-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF03008322. View

2.

Wu T, Lin S, Liu C, Chang H, Lin C . Ultrasound imaging aids infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Ma Zui Xue Za Zhi. 1993; 31(2):83-6. View

3.

Baranowski A, Pither C . A comparison of three methods of axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1990; 45(5):362-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14776.x. View

4.

Brull R, Lupu M, Perlas A, Chan V, McCartney C . Compared with dual nerve stimulation, ultrasound guidance shortens the time for infraclavicular block performance. Can J Anaesth. 2009; 56(11):812-8. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-009-9170-2. View

5.

Dhir S, Ganapathy S . Use of ultrasound guidance and contrast enhancement: a study of continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus approach. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008; 52(3):338-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01563.x. View

6.

Ootaki C, Hayashi H, Amano M . Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: an alternative technique to anatomical landmark-guided approaches. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000; 25(6):600-4. DOI: 10.1053/rapm.2000.18184. View

7.

Hadzic A, Vloka J, Hadzic N, Thys D, Santos A . Nerve stimulators used for peripheral nerve blocks vary in their electrical characteristics. Anesthesiology. 2003; 98(4):969-74. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200304000-00026. View

8.

Dingemans E, Williams S, Arcand G, Chouinard P, Harris P, Ruel M . Neurostimulation in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: a prospective randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2007; 104(5):1275-80, tables of contents. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000226101.63736.20. View

9.

Sandhu N, Capan L . Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth. 2002; 89(2):254-9. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aef186. View

10.

Taboada M, Rodriguez J, Amor M, Sabate S, Alvarez J, Cortes J . Is ultrasound guidance superior to conventional nerve stimulation for coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block?. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009; 34(4):357-60. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ac7c19. View

11.

Sauter A, Dodgson M, Stubhaug A, Halstensen A, Klaastad O . Electrical nerve stimulation or ultrasound guidance for lateral sagittal infraclavicular blocks: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, comparative study. Anesth Analg. 2008; 106(6):1910-5. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318173280f. View

Ultrasound Does Not Shorten the Duration of Procedure but Provides a Faster Sensory and Motor Block Onset in Comparison to Nerve Stimulator in Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block