» Articles » PMID: 23645913

A Cross-sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals to Determine What They Believe Constitutes 'specialist' Care for Teenage and Young Adult Patients with Cancer

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2013 May 7
PMID 23645913
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To examine the attitudes of UK healthcare professionals towards what they believe constitutes specialist care for teenage and young adult (TYA) patients with cancer, to determine which factors they considered to be the most important components of specialist TYA care, and whether opinion varied between clinical specialties and reflected the drivers for care improvements within National Health Service (NHS) policy.

Design And Methods: The study utilised a cross-sectional survey, using Likert scales, to assess attitudes towards specialist care. Responses were grouped using model-based clustering methods implemented in LatentGold 4.5.

Setting: Participants from 98 NHS trusts in the UK were invited to participate in the study.

Participants: 691 healthcare professionals involved in the management of TYA patients were approached; of these, 338 responded.

Results: 338 healthcare professionals responded (51.9% of those invited). Responses were grouped into three clusters according to the pattern of responses to the questions. One cluster rated age-appropriate care above all else, the second rated both age and site-appropriate care highly while the third assigned more importance to site-specific care. Overall, the psychosocial and supportive aspects of care were rated highest while statements relating to factors known to be important (access to clinical trials, treatment at a high volume centre and specialist diagnostics) were not rated as highly as expected.

Conclusions: Attitudes varied widely between professionals treating TYA patients with cancer as to what constitutes key aspects of specialist care. Further work is needed to quantify the extent to which this influences practice.

Citing Articles

Geographical Factors Affecting the Admission of Teenagers and Young Adults to Age-Specialist Inpatient Cancer Care in England.

Birch R, Morris E, Stark D, Morgan S, Lewis I, West R J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2014; 3(1):28-36.

PMID: 24669356 PMC: 3955975. DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2013.0016.

References
1.
Newburger P, Elfenbein D, Boxer L . Adolescents with cancer: access to clinical trials and age-appropriate care. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2002; 14(1):1-4. DOI: 10.1097/00008480-200202000-00001. View

2.
Whelan J . Where should teenagers with cancer be treated?. Eur J Cancer. 2003; 39(18):2573-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.09.014. View

3.
Abrams A, Hazen E, Penson R . Psychosocial issues in adolescents with cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007; 33(7):622-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.12.006. View

4.
Clerici C, Massimino M, Casanova M, Cefalo G, Terenziani M, Vasquez R . Psychological referral and consultation for adolescents and young adults with cancer treated at pediatric oncology unit. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008; 51(1):105-9. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.21484. View

5.
Alston R, Rowan S, Eden T, Moran A, Birch J . Cancer incidence patterns by region and socioeconomic deprivation in teenagers and young adults in England. Br J Cancer. 2007; 96(11):1760-6. PMC: 2359909. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603794. View