» Articles » PMID: 23642296

Evaluation and Optimization of Mass Spectrometric Settings During Data-dependent Acquisition Mode: Focus on LTQ-Orbitrap Mass Analyzers

Overview
Journal J Proteome Res
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2013 May 7
PMID 23642296
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mass-spectrometry-based proteomics has evolved as the preferred method for the analysis of complex proteomes. Undoubtedly, recent advances in mass spectrometry instrumentation have greatly enhanced proteomic analysis. A popular instrument platform in proteomics research is the LTQ-Orbitrap mass analyzer. In this tutorial, we discuss the significance of evaluating and optimizing mass spectrometric settings on the LTQ-Orbitrap during CID data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode to improve protein and peptide identification rates. We focus on those MS and MS/MS parameters that have been systematically examined and evaluated by several researchers and are commonly used during DDA. More specifically, we discuss the effect of mass resolving power, preview mode for FTMS scan, monoisotopic precursor selection, signal threshold for triggering MS/MS events, number of microscans per MS/MS scan, number of MS/MS events, automatic gain control target value (ion population) for MS and MS/MS, maximum ion injection time for MS/MS, rapid and normal scan rate, and prediction of ion injection time. We furthermore present data from the latest generation LTQ-Orbitrap system, the Orbitrap Elite, along with recommended MS and MS/MS parameters. The Orbitrap Elite outperforms the Orbitrap Classic in terms of scan speed, sensitivity, dynamic range, and resolving power and results in higher identification rates. Several of the optimized MS parameters determined on the LTQ-Orbitrap Classic and XL were easily transferable to the Orbitrap Elite, whereas others needed to be reevaluated. Finally, the Q Exactive and HCD are briefly discussed, as well as sample preparation, LC-optimization, and bioinformatics analysis. We hope this tutorial will serve as guidance for researchers new to the field of proteomics and assist in achieving optimal results.

Citing Articles

Identification of Protein Networks and Biological Pathways Driving the Progression of Atherosclerosis in Human Carotid Arteries Through Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.

Kallo G, Zaman K, Potor L, Hendrik Z, Mehes G, Toth C Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 25(24.

PMID: 39769427 PMC: 11728284. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252413665.


An Enzymatic and Proteomic Analysis of during Biodegradation of Gossypol in Cottonseed.

Neto C, Gomes T, Filho E, Fontes W, Ricart C, Almeida J J Fungi (Basel). 2024; 10(5).

PMID: 38786676 PMC: 11121953. DOI: 10.3390/jof10050321.


Proteomes of plasmodium knowlesi early and late ring-stage parasites and infected host erythrocytes.

Anderson D, Peterson M, Lapp S, Galinski M J Proteomics. 2024; 302:105197.

PMID: 38759952 PMC: 11357705. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2024.105197.


A planar quadrupole device for transmitting and trapping ions in high vacuum.

Park S, Mohr J, Anderson G, Bruce J Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2023; 37(18):e9610.

PMID: 37580843 PMC: 11867028. DOI: 10.1002/rcm.9610.


Optimization of Mass Spectrometric Parameters in Data Dependent Acquisition for Untargeted Metabolomics on the Basis of Putative Assignments.

Assress H, Ferruzzi M, Lan R J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2023; 34(8):1621-1631.

PMID: 37419493 PMC: 10402710. DOI: 10.1021/jasms.3c00084.


References
1.
Michalski A, Cox J, Mann M . More than 100,000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC-MS/MS. J Proteome Res. 2011; 10(4):1785-93. DOI: 10.1021/pr101060v. View

2.
Bladergroen M, Derks R, Nicolardi S, de Visser B, van Berloo S, van der Burgt Y . Standardized and automated solid-phase extraction procedures for high-throughput proteomics of body fluids. J Proteomics. 2012; 77:144-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.07.023. View

3.
Scigelova M, Hornshaw M, Giannakopulos A, Makarov A . Fourier transform mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011; 10(7):M111.009431. PMC: 3134075. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M111.009431. View

4.
Manza L, Stamer S, Ham A, Codreanu S, Liebler D . Sample preparation and digestion for proteomic analyses using spin filters. Proteomics. 2005; 5(7):1742-5. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200401063. View

5.
Gokce E, Andrews G, Dean R, Muddiman D . Increasing proteome coverage with offline RP HPLC coupled to online RP nanoLC-MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2011; 879(9-10):610-4. PMC: 3703961. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.01.032. View