» Articles » PMID: 23641794

Visualizing Osteogenesis in Vivo Within a Cell-scaffold Construct for Bone Tissue Engineering Using Two-photon Microscopy

Overview
Date 2013 May 7
PMID 23641794
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tissue-engineering therapies have shown early success in the clinic, however, the cell-biomaterial interactions that result in successful outcomes are not yet well understood and are difficult to observe. Here we describe a method for visualizing bone formation within a tissue-engineered construct in vivo, at a single-cell resolution, and in situ in three dimensions using two-photon microscopy. First, two-photon microscopy and histological perspectives were spatially linked using fluorescent reporters for cells in the skeletal lineage. In the process, the tissue microenvironment that precedes a repair-focused study was described. The distribution and organization of type I collagen in the calvarial microenvironment was also described using its second harmonic signal. Second, this platform was used to observe in vivo, for the first time, host cells, donor cells, scaffold, and new bone formation within cell-seeded constructs in a bone defect. We examined constructs during bone repair 4 and 6 weeks after implantation. New bone formed on scaffolds, primarily by donor cells. Host cells formed a new periosteal layer that covered the implant. Scaffold resorption appeared to be site specific, where areas near the top were removed and deeper areas were completely embedded in new mineral. Visualizing the in vivo progression of the cell and scaffold microenvironment will contribute to our understanding of tissue-engineered regeneration and should lead to the development of more streamlined and therapeutically powerful approaches.

Citing Articles

Characterization of Biocompatibility of Functional Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting.

Kim J Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(4).

PMID: 37106644 PMC: 10135811. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10040457.


Arthritis-associated osteoclastogenic macrophage, AtoM, as a key player in pathological bone erosion.

Agemura T, Hasegawa T, Yari S, Kikuta J, Ishii M Inflamm Regen. 2022; 42(1):17.

PMID: 35650653 PMC: 9161570. DOI: 10.1186/s41232-022-00206-w.


Ultra-low binder content 3D printed calcium phosphate graphene scaffolds as resorbable, osteoinductive matrices that support bone formation in vivo.

Daneshmandi L, Holt B, Arnold A, Laurencin C, Sydlik S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):6960.

PMID: 35484292 PMC: 9050648. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10603-3.


High-Resolution Imaging for the Analysis and Reconstruction of 3D Microenvironments for Regenerative Medicine: An Application-Focused Review.

Klontzas M, Protonotarios A Bioengineering (Basel). 2021; 8(11).

PMID: 34821748 PMC: 8614770. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering8110182.


Accuracy of digital model generated from CT data with metal artifact reduction algorithm.

Lee C, Lee A, Choi Y, Jeon K, Kim Y, Han S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):10332.

PMID: 33990637 PMC: 8121776. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89298-x.


References
1.
Khanna K, McNamara J, Lefrancois L . In situ imaging of the endogenous CD8 T cell response to infection. Science. 2007; 318(5847):116-20. PMC: 2846662. DOI: 10.1126/science.1146291. View

2.
Griffith L, Naughton G . Tissue engineering--current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science. 2002; 295(5557):1009-14. DOI: 10.1126/science.1069210. View

3.
Page-McCaw A, Ewald A, Werb Z . Matrix metalloproteinases and the regulation of tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 8(3):221-33. PMC: 2760082. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2125. View

4.
Macchiarini P, Jungebluth P, Go T, Asnaghi M, Rees L, Cogan T . Clinical transplantation of a tissue-engineered airway. Lancet. 2008; 372(9655):2023-30. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61598-6. View

5.
Mostany R, Portera-Cailliau C . A method for 2-photon imaging of blood flow in the neocortex through a cranial window. J Vis Exp. 2008; (12). PMC: 2582841. DOI: 10.3791/678. View