» Articles » PMID: 23638841

Potential Environmental and Human Health Impacts of Rechargeable Lithium Batteries in Electronic Waste

Overview
Date 2013 May 4
PMID 23638841
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rechargeable lithium-ion (Li-ion) and lithium-polymer (Li-poly) batteries have recently become dominant in consumer electronic products because of advantages associated with energy density and product longevity. However, the small size of these batteries, the high rate of disposal of consumer products in which they are used, and the lack of uniform regulatory policy on their disposal means that lithium batteries may contribute substantially to environmental pollution and adverse human health impacts due to potentially toxic materials. In this research, we used standardized leaching tests, life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA), and hazard assessment models to evaluate hazardous waste classification, resource depletion potential, and toxicity potentials of lithium batteries used in cellphones. Our results demonstrate that according to U.S. federal regulations, defunct Li-ion batteries are classified hazardous due to their lead (Pb) content (average 6.29 mg/L; σ = 11.1; limit 5). However, according to California regulations, all lithium batteries tested are classified hazardous due to excessive levels of cobalt (average 163,544 mg/kg; σ = 62,897; limit 8000), copper (average 98,694 mg/kg; σ = 28,734; limit 2500), and nickel (average 9525 mg/kg; σ = 11,438; limit 2000). In some of the Li-ion batteries, the leached concentrations of chromium, lead, and thallium exceeded the California regulation limits. The environmental impact associated with resource depletion and human toxicity is mainly associated with cobalt, copper, nickel, thallium, and silver, whereas the ecotoxicity potential is primarily associated with cobalt, copper, nickel, thallium, and silver. However, the relative contribution of aluminum and lithium to human toxicity and ecotoxicity could not be estimated due to insufficient toxicity data in the models. These findings support the need for stronger government policy at the local, national, and international levels to encourage recovery, recycling, and reuse of lithium battery materials.

Citing Articles

Wearable Electrochemical Biosensors for Advanced Healthcare Monitoring.

Duan H, Peng S, He S, Tang S, Goda K, Wang C Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 12(2):e2411433.

PMID: 39588557 PMC: 11727287. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202411433.


Graphite-Phosphate Composites: Structure and Voltammetric Investigations.

Rada S, Gorea A, Culea E Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(20).

PMID: 39459703 PMC: 11509367. DOI: 10.3390/ma17205000.


Early-stage recovery of lithium from spent batteries via CO-assisted leaching optimized by response surface methodology.

Milicevic Neumann K, Ans M, Friedrich B Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17369.

PMID: 39075102 PMC: 11775341. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67761-9.


Protective effect of cholecalciferol against cobalt-induced neurotoxicity in rats: ZO-1/iFABP, ChAT/AchE and antioxidant pathways as potential therapeutic targets.

Akinrinde A, Adeoye B, Samuel E, Mustapha O Biol Trace Elem Res. 2024; 203(3):1555-1570.

PMID: 38836989 DOI: 10.1007/s12011-024-04258-6.


First principles-based design of lightweight high entropy alloys.

Sorkin V, Yu Z, Chen S, Tan T, Aitken Z, Zhang Y Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22549.

PMID: 38110508 PMC: 10728166. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49258-z.


References
1.
Lim S, Schoenung J . Human health and ecological toxicity potentials due to heavy metal content in waste electronic devices with flat panel displays. J Hazard Mater. 2010; 177(1-3):251-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.025. View

2.
Musson S, Vann K, Jang Y, Mutha S, Jordan A, Pearson B . RCRA toxicity characterization of discarded electronic devices. Environ Sci Technol. 2006; 40(8):2721-6. DOI: 10.1021/es051557n. View

3.
Lim S, Kang D, Ogunseitan O, Schoenung J . Potential environmental impacts from the metals in incandescent, compact fluorescent lamp (CFL), and light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 47(2):1040-7. DOI: 10.1021/es302886m. View

4.
Lincoln J, Ogunseitan O, Shapiro A, Saphores J . Leaching assessments of hazardous materials in cellular telephones. Environ Sci Technol. 2007; 41(7):2572-8. DOI: 10.1021/es0610479. View

5.
Ogunseitan O, Schoenung J, Saphores J, Shapiro A . Science and regulation. The electronics revolution: from e-wonderland to e-wasteland. Science. 2009; 326(5953):670-1. DOI: 10.1126/science.1176929. View