» Articles » PMID: 23638103

Phylogeny of Bacterial and Archaeal Genomes Using Conserved Genes: Supertrees and Supermatrices

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 May 3
PMID 23638103
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over 3000 microbial (bacterial and archaeal) genomes have been made publically available to date, providing an unprecedented opportunity to examine evolutionary genomic trends and offering valuable reference data for a variety of other studies such as metagenomics. The utility of these genome sequences is greatly enhanced when we have an understanding of how they are phylogenetically related to each other. Therefore, we here describe our efforts to reconstruct the phylogeny of all available bacterial and archaeal genomes. We identified 24, single-copy, ubiquitous genes suitable for this phylogenetic analysis. We used two approaches to combine the data for the 24 genes. First, we concatenated alignments of all genes into a single alignment from which a Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree was inferred using RAxML. Second, we used a relatively new approach to combining gene data, Bayesian Concordance Analysis (BCA), as implemented in the BUCKy software, in which the results of 24 single-gene phylogenetic analyses are used to generate a "primary concordance" tree. A comparison of the concatenated ML tree and the primary concordance (BUCKy) tree reveals that the two approaches give similar results, relative to a phylogenetic tree inferred from the 16S rRNA gene. After comparing the results and the methods used, we conclude that the current best approach for generating a single phylogenetic tree, suitable for use as a reference phylogeny for comparative analyses, is to perform a maximum likelihood analysis of a concatenated alignment of conserved, single-copy genes.

Citing Articles

Multidisciplinary methodologies used in the study of cable bacteria.

Wawryk M, Ley P, Vasquez-Cardenas D, Tabor R, Cook P FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2024; 49.

PMID: 39673715 PMC: 11774119. DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuae030.


Pathogenomic profile and clonal diversity of potential zoonotic MRSA-CC7-ST789-t091-SCCmecV from human skin and soft tissue infections.

Akinduti P, Motayo B, Maged E, Isibor P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19326.

PMID: 39164371 PMC: 11335753. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67388-w.


Advancements in prokaryotic systematics and the role of Bergey's International Society for Microbial Systematicsin addressing challenges in the meta-data era.

Jiao J, Abdugheni R, Zhang D, Ahmed I, Ali M, Chuvochina M Natl Sci Rev. 2024; 11(7):nwae168.

PMID: 39071100 PMC: 11275469. DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwae168.


A Guide to Phylogenomic Inference.

Patane J, Martins Jr J, Setubal J Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2802:267-345.

PMID: 38819564 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3838-5_11.


Phylogenomic Testing of Root Hypotheses.

Tria F, Landan G, Picazo D, Dagan T Genome Biol Evol. 2023; 15(6).

PMID: 37247390 PMC: 10262964. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evad096.


References
1.
Ren F, Tanaka H, Yang Z . A likelihood look at the supermatrix-supertree controversy. Gene. 2008; 441(1-2):119-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.04.002. View

2.
Kubatko L, Carstens B, Lacey Knowles L . STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(7):971-3. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp079. View

3.
Miroshnichenko M, Rainey F, Rhode M, Bonch-Osmolovskaya E . Hippea maritima gen. nov., sp. nov., a new genus of thermophilic, sulfur-reducing bacterium from submarine hot vents. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999; 49 Pt 3:1033-8. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-49-3-1033. View

4.
Lozupone C, Knight R . UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(12):8228-35. PMC: 1317376. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005. View

5.
. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 2018; 25(50):367-404. PMC: 5184128. View