» Articles » PMID: 23637757

The Impact of Clinical Social Franchising on Health Services in Low- and Middle-income Countries: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 May 3
PMID 23637757
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The private sector plays a large role in health services delivery in low- and middle-income countries; yet significant gaps remain in the quality and accessibility of private sector services. Clinical social franchising, which applies the commercial franchising model to achieve social goals and improve health care, is increasingly used in developing countries to respond to these limitations. Despite the growth of this approach, limited evidence documents the effect of social franchising on improving health care quality and access.

Objectives And Methods: We examined peer-reviewed and grey literature to evaluate the effect of social franchising on health care quality, equity, cost-effectiveness, and health outcomes. We included all studies of clinical social franchise programs located in low- and middle-income countries. We assessed study bias using the WHO-Johns Hopkins Rigour Scale and used narrative synthesis to evaluate the findings.

Results: Of 113 identified articles, 23 were included in this review; these evaluated a small sample of franchises globally and focused on reproductive health franchises. Results varied widely across outcomes and programs. Social franchising was positively associated with increased client volume and client satisfaction. The findings on health care utilization and health impact were mixed; some studies find that franchises significantly outperform other models of health care, while others show franchises are equivalent to or worse than other private or public clinics. In two areas, cost-effectiveness and equity, social franchises were generally found to have poorer outcomes.

Conclusions: Our review indicates that social franchising may strengthen some elements of private sector health care. However, gaps in the evidence remain. Additional research should include: further documentation of the effect of social franchising, evaluating the equity and cost-effectiveness of this intervention, and assessing the role of franchising within the context of the greater healthcare delivery system.

Citing Articles

Delivering maternal and child health interventions through the private sector in LMIC: a scoping review of strategies and effective approaches.

Awor P, Kinengyere A BMJ Public Health. 2025; 1(1):e000088.

PMID: 40017878 PMC: 11812706. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000088.


Social franchising in healthcare: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of implementation and outcomes.

Rahman M, Perkins J, Usmani N, Manna R, Refat Uz Zaman Sajib M, Akter E BMJ Glob Health. 2025; 10(2).

PMID: 39961691 PMC: 11836815. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017101.


Early Lessons From Working With Local Partners to Expand Private-Sector Health Care Networks in Burundi and Mali.

Gahimbare L, Shalita N, Dumas E, Rodriguez M, Moon P Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 39401805 PMC: 11521560. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00109.


Bangladesh should engage the private sector for malaria elimination by 2030.

McArdle R, Phru C, Hossain M, Alam M, Haldar K Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2024; 31:100487.

PMID: 39399862 PMC: 11465204. DOI: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100487.


Utilization of social franchising in family planning services: a Pakistan perspective.

Nayab , Ahmad T, Fatmee A, Sajjad I, Usmani Z, Khan A Front Glob Womens Health. 2024; 5:1376374.

PMID: 38826760 PMC: 11140052. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1376374.


References
1.
Shah N, Brieger W, Peters D . Can interventions improve health services from informal private providers in low and middle-income countries?: a comprehensive review of the literature. Health Policy Plan. 2010; 26(4):275-87. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czq074. View

2.
Shah N, Wang W, Bishai D . Comparing private sector family planning services to government and NGO services in Ethiopia and Pakistan: how do social franchises compare across quality, equity and cost?. Health Policy Plan. 2011; 26 Suppl 1:i63-71. PMC: 3606031. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czr027. View

3.
Qureshi A . Case Study: Does training of private networks of Family Planning clinicians in urban Pakistan affect service utilization?. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010; 10:26. PMC: 2988759. DOI: 10.1186/1472-698X-10-26. View

4.
Ramarao S, Lacuesta M, Costello M, Pangolibay B, Jones H . The link between quality of care and contraceptive use. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003; 29(2):76-83. DOI: 10.1363/ifpp.29.076.03. View

5.
Ngo A, Alden D, Pham V, Phan H . The impact of social franchising on the use of reproductive health and family planning services at public commune health stations in Vietnam. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10:54. PMC: 2845125. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-54. View