» Articles » PMID: 23636304

Delay Discounting of Food and Remifentanil in Rhesus Monkeys

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2013 May 3
PMID 23636304
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Drug abuse can be conceptualized as choice between drug and nondrug reinforcers in which drug choice is excessive; factors impacting drug taking can be examined using procedures in which subjects choose between drug and an alternative reinforcer.

Objective: This experiment examined the effects of delayed reinforcement on choice between food and the mu-opioid receptor agonist remifentanil.

Methods: Rhesus monkeys responded under a concurrent fixed-ratio 5, fixed-ratio 5 schedule in which responding on one lever delivered one food pellet and responding on another lever delivered an i.v. infusion.

Results: With no delay, monkeys responded predominantly for food rather than saline or small doses of remifentanil; as the dose of remifentanil increased (0.1-1.0 μg/kg/infusion), monkeys responded more for drug. Delaying delivery (30-240 s) of 0.32 and not 1.0 μg/kg/infusion of remifentanil (food delivered immediately) decreased responding for drug and increased responding for food, resulting in a rightward shift in the remifentanil dose-effect curve. Delaying delivery of food (60-240 s) when doses of remifentanil smaller than 0.32 μg/kg/infusion (but not saline) were available decreased responding for food and increased responding for drug, resulting in a leftward shift in the remifentanil dose-effect curve.

Conclusion: These results provide evidence that delaying the delivery of a mu-opioid receptor agonist reduces its potency as a positive reinforcer; more importantly, delaying the delivery of an alternative nondrug reinforcer (e.g., food) enhances the reinforcing potency of the agonist. Thus, understanding the factors that control substance abuse requires examination of contingencies for both drug and nondrug reinforcers.

Citing Articles

Choice between food and cocaine or fentanyl reinforcers under fixed and variable schedules in female and male rhesus monkeys.

Doyle W, Freeman K, Woods J, Huskinson S Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023; 240(7):1573-1585.

PMID: 37266685 PMC: 10581032. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-023-06391-x.


Choice between food and cocaine reinforcers under fixed and variable schedules in female and male rhesus monkeys.

Zamarripa C, Doyle W, Freeman K, Rowlett J, Huskinson S Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022; 31(1):204-218.

PMID: 35099243 PMC: 9339013. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000547.


Challenges to Conducting Contingency Management Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: Practice Recommendations for Clinicians.

Pfund R, Cook J, McAfee N, Huskinson S, Parker J Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2021; 52(2):137-145.

PMID: 34421192 PMC: 8372300. DOI: 10.1037/pro0000356.


A drug-vs-food "choice" self-administration procedure in rats to investigate pharmacological and environmental mechanisms of substance use disorders.

Townsend E, Schwienteck K, Robinson H, Lawson S, Banks M J Neurosci Methods. 2021; 354:109110.

PMID: 33705855 PMC: 8082467. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109110.


Learning from lorcaserin: lessons from the negative clinical trial of lorcaserin to treat cocaine use disorder.

Negus S, Banks M Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020; 45(12):1967-1973.

PMID: 32839526 PMC: 7547654. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-020-00815-4.


References
1.
Ainslie G . Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol Bull. 1975; 82(4):463-96. DOI: 10.1037/h0076860. View

2.
Banks M, Blough B, Negus S . Interaction between behavioral and pharmacological treatment strategies to decrease cocaine choice in rhesus monkeys. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012; 38(3):395-404. PMC: 3547190. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2012.193. View

3.
Perry J, Carroll M . The role of impulsive behavior in drug abuse. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008; 200(1):1-26. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1173-0. View

4.
Roll J, Reilly M, Johanson C . The influence of exchange delays on cigarette versus money choice: a laboratory analog of voucher-based reinforcement therapy. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000; 8(3):366-70. DOI: 10.1037//1064-1297.8.3.366. View

5.
Nader M, Woolverton W . Effects of increasing the magnitude of an alternative reinforcer on drug choice in a discrete-trials choice procedure. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991; 105(2):169-74. DOI: 10.1007/BF02244304. View