» Articles » PMID: 23635906

Prediction of Treatment Response and the Effect of Independent Component Neurofeedback in Obsessive-compulsive Disorder: a Randomized, Sham-controlled, Double-blind Study

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 May 3
PMID 23635906
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The goal of this study was to assess the effect of independent component neurofeedback (NFB) on EEG and clinical symptoms in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Subsequently, we explored predictors of treatment response and EEG correlates of clinical symptoms.

Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, parallel design, 20 inpatients with OCD underwent 25 sessions of NFB or sham feedback (SFB). NFB aimed at reducing EEG activity in an independent component previously reported abnormal in this diagnosis. Resting-state EEG recorded before and after the treatment was analyzed to assess its posttreatment changes, relationships with clinical symptoms and treatment response.

Results: Overall, clinical improvement in OCD patients was not accompanied by EEG change as assessed by standardized low-resolution electromagnetic tomography and normative independent component analysis. Pre- to posttreatment comparison of the trained component and frequency did not yield significant results; however, in the NFB group, the nominal values at the downtrained frequency were lower after treatment. The NFB group showed significantly higher percentage reduction of compulsions compared to the SFB group (p = 0.015). Pretreatment higher amount of delta (1-6 Hz) and low alpha oscillations as well as a lower amount of high beta activity predicted a worse treatment outcome. Source localization of these delta and high beta oscillations corresponded with previous EEG resting-state findings in OCD patients compared to healthy controls.

Conclusion: Independent component NFB in OCD proved useful in percentage improvement of compulsions. Based on our correlation analyses, we hypothesize that we targeted a network related to treatment resistance.

Citing Articles

Is There Evidence for the Specificity of Closed-Loop Brain Training in the Treatment of Internalizing Disorders? A Systematic Review.

Perez T, Mathew J, Glue P, Adhia D, Ridder D Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:821136.

PMID: 35360168 PMC: 8960197. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.821136.


Neuromodulation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.

Buhagiar F, Fitzgerald M, Bell J, Allanson F, Pestell C Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:598208.

PMID: 33362494 PMC: 7759622. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.598208.


Predictors of neurofeedback training outcome: A systematic review.

Weber L, Ethofer T, Ehlis A Neuroimage Clin. 2020; 27:102301.

PMID: 32604020 PMC: 7327249. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102301.


How New Technologies Can Improve Prediction, Assessment, and Intervention in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (e-OCD): Review.

Ferreri F, Bourla A, Peretti C, Segawa T, Jaafari N, Mouchabac S JMIR Ment Health. 2019; 6(12):e11643.

PMID: 31821153 PMC: 6930507. DOI: 10.2196/11643.


Therapeutic Applications of BCI Technologies.

McFarland D, Daly J, Boulay C, Parvaz M Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon). 2018; 47(1-2):37-52.

PMID: 29527538 PMC: 5843196. DOI: 10.1080/2326263X.2017.1307625.