» Articles » PMID: 23628525

Evaluation of Four Different Equations for Calculating LDL-C with Eight Different Direct HDL-C Assays

Abstract

Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is often calculated (cLDL-C) by the Friedewald equation, which requires high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG). Because there have been considerable changes in the measurement of HDL-C with the introduction of direct assays, several alternative equations have recently been proposed.

Methods: We compared 4 equations (Friedewald, Vujovic, Chen, and Anandaraja) for cLDL-C, using 8 different direct HDL-C (dHDL-C) methods. LDL-C values were calculated by the 4 equations and determined by the β quantification reference method procedure in 164 subjects.

Results: For normotriglyceridemic samples (TG<200mg/dl), between 6.2% and 24.8% of all results exceeded the total error goal of 12% for LDL-C, depending on the dHDL-C assay and cLDL-C equation used. Friedewald equation was found to be the optimum equation for most but not all dHDL-C assays, typically leading to less than 10% misclassification of cardiovascular risk based on LDL-C. Hypertriglyceridemic samples (>200mg/dl) showed a large cardiovascular risk misclassification rate (30%-50%) for all combinations of dHDL-C assays and cLDL-C equations.

Conclusion: The Friedewald equation showed the best performance for estimating LDL-C, but its accuracy varied considerably depending on the specific dHDL-C assay used. None of the cLDL-C equations performed adequately for hypertriglyceridemic samples.

Citing Articles

Impact of ginger powder (Zingiber officinale) supplementation on the performance, biochemical parameters, antioxidant status, and rumen fermentation in Ossimi rams.

Ali M, Alsalamah S, Al-Thubyani S, Baazaoui N, Ahmed A, Nasser M Vet World. 2024; 17(7):1619-1628.

PMID: 39185052 PMC: 11344107. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.1619-1628.


Apolipoprotein E Gene Variation in Pakistani Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes with and without Cardiovascular Complications.

Nadeem S, Maqbool T, Qureshi J, Altaf A, Naz S, Azhar M Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(6).

PMID: 38929578 PMC: 11205396. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60060961.


Association of non-HDL-C/apoB ratio with long-term mortality in the general population: A cohort study.

Zhang K, Wei C, Shao Y, Wang L, Zhao Z, Yin S Heliyon. 2024; 10(6):e28155.

PMID: 38545184 PMC: 10965529. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28155.


Standardization of Apolipoprotein B, LDL-Cholesterol, and Non-HDL-Cholesterol.

Contois J, Langlois M, Cobbaert C, Sniderman A J Am Heart Assoc. 2023; 12(15):e030405.

PMID: 37489721 PMC: 10492988. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030405.


Comparison of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations in patients with dyslipidaemia receiving cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibition.

Martin S, Ditmarsch M, Simmons M, Alp N, Turner T, Davidson M Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022; 9(2):148-155.

PMID: 36307922 PMC: 9892865. DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac056.


References
1.
Bachorik P, Ross J . National Cholesterol Education Program recommendations for measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: executive summary. The National Cholesterol Education Program Working Group on Lipoprotein Measurement. Clin Chem. 1995; 41(10):1414-20. View

2.
Vujovic A, Kotur-Stevuljevic J, Spasic S, Bujisic N, Martinovic J, Vujovic M . Evaluation of different formulas for LDL-C calculation. Lipids Health Dis. 2010; 9:27. PMC: 2847568. DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-9-27. View

3.
Chen Y, Zhang X, Pan B, Jin X, Yao H, Chen B . A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values. Lipids Health Dis. 2010; 9:52. PMC: 2890624. DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-9-52. View

4.
Liu J, Sempos C, Donahue R, Dorn J, Trevisan M, Grundy S . Joint distribution of non-HDL and LDL cholesterol and coronary heart disease risk prediction among individuals with and without diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(8):1916-21. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.8.1916. View

5.
Miller W, Myers G, Sakurabayashi I, Bachmann L, Caudill S, Dziekonski A . Seven direct methods for measuring HDL and LDL cholesterol compared with ultracentrifugation reference measurement procedures. Clin Chem. 2010; 56(6):977-86. PMC: 4687457. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.142810. View