» Articles » PMID: 23623444

Referral Patterns and Service Utilization in a Pediatric Hospital-wide Intimate Partner Violence Program

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2013 Apr 30
PMID 23623444
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To describe the referral patterns and utilization of on-site intimate partner violence (IPV) services in both inpatient and outpatient settings at a large urban children's hospital.

Methods: Retrospective review of case records from IPV victims referred to an on-site IPV counselor between September 2005 and February 2010. Descriptive statistics were used to examine IPV victim demographics, number of referrals per hospital department, referral source (type of staff member), time spent by IPV counselor for initial consultation, and services provided to IPV victims.

Results: A total of 453 unique referrals were made to the IPV counselor: 81% were identified by universal screening and 19% by risk-based screening. Thirty-six percent of IPV victims were referred from primary care clinics; 26% from inpatient units; 13% from outpatient subspecialty clinics; 12.5% from the emergency department; 5% from the Child Protection Program; and 4% were employee self-referrals. Social workers generated the most referrals (55%), followed by attending physicians (17%), residents (13%), nurses (7%), and other individuals (self-referrals) (4%). The median initial IPV intervention required 42 minutes. Supportive counseling and safety planning were the services most often utilized by IPV victims.

Conclusions: IPV screening can be successfully integrated in both inpatient and outpatient settings by a multidisciplinary group of hospital staff. Most referrals were generated by universal screening outside of the primary care setting. IPV victims generally desired supportive counseling and safety planning over immediate housing relocation. Many IPV screening opportunities were missed by using verbal screening alone.

Citing Articles

Pediatricians' Practices and Desired Resources for Addressing Intimate Partner Violence.

Scott S, Ragavan M, Mickievicz E, Handrinos A, Amodei J, Chang J Partner Abuse. 2024; 15(4):550-570.

PMID: 39568864 PMC: 11578101. DOI: 10.1891/pa-2023-0044.


Acceptability and feasibility of trauma- and violence-informed care for intimate partner violence.

Tiyyagura G, Leventhal J, Schaeffer P, Gawel M, Crawley D, Frechette A Child Abuse Negl. 2024; 157:107068.

PMID: 39332141 PMC: 11512670. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107068.


"And then the person sort of just drops off the radar…": barriers in the transition from hospital to community-based care among survivors of intimate partner violence in Metropolitan Atlanta.

Evans D, Pawcio J, Wyckoff K, Wilkers L Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1332779.

PMID: 38841664 PMC: 11150547. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1332779.


Evaluation of Children after Caregiver Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study of Barriers, Facilitators, and Trauma- and Violence-Informed Care.

Tiyyagura G, Clayton N, Schaeffer P, Gawel M, Leventhal J, Hammel K J Pediatr. 2023; 260:113519.

PMID: 37244576 PMC: 10527175. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113519.


Feasibility of Screening Programs for Domestic Violence in Pediatric and Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: A Literature Review.

Arigliani E, Arico M, Cavalli G, Aceti F, Sogos C, Romani M Brain Sci. 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 36138971 PMC: 9497097. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12091235.