» Articles » PMID: 23610176

Export-oriented Deforestation in Mato Grosso: Harbinger or Exception for Other Tropical Forests?

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2013 Apr 24
PMID 23610176
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Brazilian state of Mato Grosso was a global deforestation hotspot in the early 2000s. Deforested land is used predominantly to produce meat for distal consumption either through cattle ranching or soya bean for livestock feed. Deforestation declined dramatically in the latter part of the decade through a combination of market forces, policies, enforcement and improved monitoring. This study assesses how representative the national-level drivers underlying Mato Grosso's export-oriented deforestation are in other tropical forest countries based on agricultural exports, commercial agriculture and urbanization. We also assess how pervasive the governance and technical monitoring capacity that enabled Mato Grosso's decline in deforestation is in other countries. We find that between 41 and 54 per cent of 2000-2005 deforestation in tropical forest countries (other than Brazil) occurred in countries with drivers similar to Brazil. Very few countries had national-level governance and capacity similar to Brazil. Results suggest that the ecological, hydrological and social consequences of land-use change for export-oriented agriculture as discussed in this Theme Issue were applicable in about one-third of all tropical forest countries in 2000-2005. However, the feasibility of replicating Mato Grosso's success with controlling deforestation is more limited. Production landscapes to support distal consumption similar to Mato Grosso are likely to become more prevalent and are unlikely to follow a land-use transition model with increasing forest cover.

Citing Articles

The costs and benefits of primary prevention of zoonotic pandemics.

Bernstein A, Ando A, Loch-Temzelides T, Vale M, Li B, Li H Sci Adv. 2022; 8(5):eabl4183.

PMID: 35119921 PMC: 8816336. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abl4183.


How trade can drive inclusive and sustainable food system outcomes in food deficit low-income countries.

van Berkum S Food Secur. 2021; 13(6):1541-1554.

PMID: 34659592 PMC: 8511291. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-021-01218-z.


Seasonality of agricultural exposure as an important predictor of seasonal yellow fever spillover in Brazil.

Hamlet A, Ramos D, Gaythorpe K, Romano A, Garske T, Ferguson N Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):3647.

PMID: 34131128 PMC: 8206143. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23926-y.


The origin, supply chain, and deforestation risk of Brazil's beef exports.

Zu Ermgassen E, Godar J, Lathuilliere M, Lofgren P, Gardner T, Vasconcelos A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(50):31770-31779.

PMID: 33262283 PMC: 7749302. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2003270117.


Population expansion and genomic adaptation to agricultural environments of the soybean looper, .

Silva C, Cordeiro E, de Paiva J, Dourado P, Carvalho R, Head G Evol Appl. 2020; 13(8):2071-2085.

PMID: 32908605 PMC: 7463353. DOI: 10.1111/eva.12966.


References
1.
Harris N, Brown S, Hagen S, Saatchi S, Petrova S, Salas W . Baseline map of carbon emissions from deforestation in tropical regions. Science. 2012; 336(6088):1573-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1217962. View

2.
VanWey L, Spera S, de Sa R, Mahr D, Mustard J . Socioeconomic development and agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013; 368(1619):20120168. PMC: 3638434. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0168. View

3.
Nepstad D, Soares-Filho B, Merry F, Lima A, Moutinho P, Carter J . Environment. The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science. 2009; 326(5958):1350-1. DOI: 10.1126/science.1182108. View

4.
Gardner T, Ferreira J, Barlow J, Lees A, Parry L, Vieira I . A social and ecological assessment of tropical land uses at multiple scales: the Sustainable Amazon Network. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013; 368(1619):20120166. PMC: 3638432. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0166. View

5.
Fearnside P . Deforestation control in Mato Grosso: a new model for slowing the loss of Brazil's Amazon forest. Ambio. 2003; 32(5):343-5. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-32.5.343. View