» Articles » PMID: 23601984

Lack of Prognostic Significance of Conventional Peritoneal Cytology in Colorectal and Gastric Cancers: Results of EVOCAPE 2 Multicentre Prospective Study

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2013 Apr 23
PMID 23601984
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: In digestive cancers, the prognostic significance of intraperitoneal free cancer cells remains unclear (IPCC). The main objective of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of IPCC in colorectal and gastric adenocarcinoma. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the predictive significance of IPCC for the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and to evaluate the prevalence of synchronous PC and IPCC.

Methods: This was a prospective multicentre study. All patients undergoing surgery for a digestive tract cancer had peritoneal cytology taken. Patients with gastric and colorectal cancer with no residual tumour after surgery and no evidence of PC were followed-up for 2 years. The primary end point was overall survival.

Results: Between 2002 and 2007, 1364 patients were enrolled and 956 were followed-up over 2 years. Prevalence of IPCC was 5.7% in colon cancer, 0.6% in rectal cancer and 19.5% in gastric cancer. The overall 2-year survival rate for patients with IPCC was 34.7% versus 86.8% for patients with negative cytology (p<0.0001). By multivariate analysis, IPCC was not an independent prognostic factor. No relationship between cytology and recurrence was found.

Conclusion: The presence of IPCC was not an independent prognostic and didn't add any additional prognostic information to the usual prognostic factors related to the tumour (pTNM and differentiation). Moreover the presence of IPCC detected with this method didn't appear to predict development of PC. Peritoneal cytology using conventional staining doesn't seem to be a useful tool for the staging of colorectal and gastric cancers.

Citing Articles

Peritoneal Tumour DNA in Peritoneal Fluid: Emerging Tool for Peritoneal Metastasis Detection.

Mariani A, Blons H, Azais H, Laurent-Puig P, Zaanan A, Gharbi A J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024; 55(3):1463-1466.

PMID: 38809368 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01071-1.


Accurate and Rapid Detection of Peritoneal Metastasis from Gastric Cancer by AI-Assisted Stimulated Raman Molecular Cytology.

Chen X, Wu Z, He Y, Hao Z, Wang Q, Zhou K Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023; 10(21):e2300961.

PMID: 37114845 PMC: 10375130. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202300961.


Early postoperative outcomes of staging laparoscopy for peritoneal metastases with or without pressurized intra-peritoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC).

Farinha H, Mattille D, Mantziari S, Demartines N, Hubner M BMC Surg. 2022; 22(1):122.

PMID: 35354404 PMC: 8969273. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01572-5.


Conventional peritoneal cytology lacks the prognostic significance of detecting local or peritoneal recurrence in colorectal cancer: An Egyptian experience.

Shalaby M, El Baradie T, Salama M, Shaaban H, Allam R, Hafiz E JGH Open. 2021; 5(2):264-272.

PMID: 33553666 PMC: 7857300. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12482.


Free cancer cells in gastric cancer - methods of detection, clinical and prognostic importance (meta-analysis).

Kolomanska M, Gluszek S Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2020; 24(1):67-74.

PMID: 32514240 PMC: 7265965. DOI: 10.5114/wo.2020.94724.