» Articles » PMID: 23601854

Anomalous Gray Matter Structural Networks in Major Depressive Disorder

Overview
Journal Biol Psychiatry
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2013 Apr 23
PMID 23601854
Citations 84
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by abnormalities in structure, function, and connectivity in several brain regions. Few studies have examined how these regions are organized in the brain or investigated network-level structural aberrations that might be associated with depression.

Methods: We used graph analysis to examine the gray matter structural networks of individuals diagnosed with MDD (n = 93) and a demographically similar healthy comparison group (n = 151) with no history of psychopathology. The efficiency of structural networks for processing information was determined by quantifying local interconnectivity (clustering) and global integration (path length). We also compared the groups on the contributions of high-degree nodes (i.e., hubs) and regional network measures, including degree (number of connections in a node) and betweenness (fraction of short path connections in a node).

Results: Depressed participants had significantly decreased clustering in their brain networks across a range of network densities. Compared with control subjects, depressed participants had fewer hubs primarily in medial frontal and medial temporal areas, had higher degree in the left supramarginal gyrus and right gyrus rectus, and had higher betweenness in the right amygdala and left medial orbitofrontal gyrus.

Conclusions: Networks of depressed individuals are characterized by a less efficient organization involving decreased regional connectivity compared with control subjects. Regional connections in the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex may play a role in maintaining or adapting to depressive pathology. This is the first report of anomalous large-scale gray matter structural networks in MDD and provides new insights concerning the neurobiological mechanisms associated with this disorder.

Citing Articles

Mindful young brains and minds: a systematic review of the neural correlates of mindfulness-based interventions in youth.

Jande J, Treves I, Ely S, Gowatch L, Carpenter C, Shampine M Brain Imaging Behav. 2025; .

PMID: 40025263 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-025-00989-9.


Distinct clinical phenotypes and their neuroanatomic correlates in chronic traumatic brain injury.

Kumar R, Selmanovic E, Selmanovic E, Gilmore N, Spielman L, Li L medRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39974133 PMC: 11838966. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.27.25321200.


Time-varying EEG networks of major depressive disorder during facial emotion tasks.

Yang J, Li B, Dong W, Gao X, Lin Y Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(5):2605-2619.

PMID: 39555301 PMC: 11564606. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10111-2.


Regression and alignment for functional data and network topology.

Tu D, Wrobel J, Satterthwaite T, Goldsmith J, Gur R, Gur R Biostatistics. 2024; 26(1).

PMID: 39140988 PMC: 11822954. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxae026.


Transcriptional expression patterns of the cortical morphometric similarity network in progressive supranuclear palsy.

Qu J, Qu Y, Zhu R, Wu Y, Xu G, Wang D CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024; 30(8):e14901.

PMID: 39097922 PMC: 11298202. DOI: 10.1111/cns.14901.


References
1.
Bassett D, Bullmore E . Small-world brain networks. Neuroscientist. 2006; 12(6):512-23. DOI: 10.1177/1073858406293182. View

2.
Bassett D, Bullmore E . Human brain networks in health and disease. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009; 22(4):340-7. PMC: 2902726. DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32832d93dd. View

3.
Bullmore E, Sporns O . Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(3):186-98. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2575. View

4.
Zalesky A, Fornito A, Bullmore E . On the use of correlation as a measure of network connectivity. Neuroimage. 2012; 60(4):2096-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.001. View

5.
Nichols T, Hayasaka S . Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review. Stat Methods Med Res. 2003; 12(5):419-46. DOI: 10.1191/0962280203sm341ra. View