» Articles » PMID: 23601247

Cell Plasticity in Wound Healing: Paracrine Factors of M1/ M2 Polarized Macrophages Influence the Phenotypical State of Dermal Fibroblasts

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2013 Apr 23
PMID 23601247
Citations 108
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Macrophages and fibroblasts are two major players in tissue repair and fibrosis. Despite the relevance of macrophages and fibroblasts in tissue homeostasis, remarkably little is known whether macrophages are able to influence the properties of fibroblasts. Here we investigated the role of paracrine factors secreted by classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) human macrophages on human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs).

Results: HDFs stimulated with paracrine factors from M1 macrophages showed a 10 to > 100-fold increase in the expression of the inflammatory cytokines IL6, CCL2 and CCL7 and the matrix metalloproteinases MMP1 and MMP3. This indicates that factors produced by M1 macrophages induce a fibroblast phenotype with pro-inflammatory and extracellular matrix (ECM) degrading properties. HDFs stimulated with paracrine factors secreted by M2 macrophages displayed an increased proliferation rate. Interestingly, the M1-activated pro-inflammatory fibroblasts downregulated, after exposure to paracrine factors produced by M2 macrophages or non-conditioned media, the inflammatory markers as well as MMPs and upregulated their collagen production.

Conclusions: Paracrine factors of M1 or M2 polarized macrophages induced different phenotypes of HDFs and the HDF phenotypes can in turn be reversed, pointing to a high dynamic plasticity of fibroblasts in the different phases of tissue repair.

Citing Articles

Exosomal miR-122 derived from M2 macrophages induces osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of alcoholic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Le G, Wen R, Fang H, Huang Z, Wang Y, Luo H J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):107.

PMID: 39881350 PMC: 11776149. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05515-7.


Modulation of Biomaterial-Associated Fibrosis by Means of Combined Physicochemical Material Properties.

Tromp L, van der Boon T, de Hilster R, Bank R, van Rijn P Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 12(4):e2407531.

PMID: 39641386 PMC: 11789587. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202407531.


Direct M2 macrophage co-culture overrides viscoelastic hydrogel mechanics to promote fibroblast activation.

Astrab L, Skelton M, Caliari S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39463963 PMC: 11507682. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.13.618034.


How Do ROS Induce NETosis? Oxidative DNA Damage, DNA Repair, and Chromatin Decondensation.

Azzouz D, Palaniyar N Biomolecules. 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39456240 PMC: 11505619. DOI: 10.3390/biom14101307.


Differential effects of macrophage subtype-specific cytokines on fibroblast proliferation and endothelial cell function in co-culture system.

Isali I, McClellan P, Wong T, Hijaz S, Fletcher D, Liu G J Biomed Mater Res A. 2024; 113(1):e37799.

PMID: 39295242 PMC: 11669535. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37799.


References
1.
Stramer B, Mori R, Martin P . The inflammation-fibrosis link? A Jekyll and Hyde role for blood cells during wound repair. J Invest Dermatol. 2007; 127(5):1009-17. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700811. View

2.
Duffield J . The inflammatory macrophage: a story of Jekyll and Hyde. Clin Sci (Lond). 2003; 104(1):27-38. DOI: 10.1042/. View

3.
Sweet M, Hume D . CSF-1 as a regulator of macrophage activation and immune responses. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2003; 51(3):169-77. View

4.
Atamas S . Complex cytokine regulation of tissue fibrosis. Life Sci. 2002; 72(6):631-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3205(02)02299-3. View

5.
Martinez F, Gordon S, Locati M, Mantovani A . Transcriptional profiling of the human monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and polarization: new molecules and patterns of gene expression. J Immunol. 2006; 177(10):7303-11. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.7303. View