» Articles » PMID: 23596981

Effect of an Inductive Hydrogel Composed of Urinary Bladder Matrix Upon Functional Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview
Date 2013 Apr 20
PMID 23596981
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health problem with no effective clinical treatment. Use of bioactive scaffold materials has been shown to be a promising strategy for tissue regeneration and repair in a number of injury models. Of these scaffold materials, urinary bladder matrix (UBM) derived from porcine bladder tissue, has demonstrated desirable properties for supporting and promoting the growth of neural cells in vitro, suggesting its potential as a scaffold for brain tissue repair in the treatment of TBI. Herein we evaluate the biocompatibility of UBM within brain tissue and the effects of UBM delivery upon functional outcome following TBI. A hydrogel form of UBM was injected into healthy rat brains for 1, 3, and 21 days to examine the tissue response to UBM. Multiple measures of tissue injury, including reactive astrocytosis, microglial activation, and neuron degeneration showed that UBM had no deleterious effects on normal brain. Following TBI, the brains were evaluated histologically and behaviorally between sham-operated controls and UBM- and vehicle-treated groups. Application of UBM reduced lesion volume and attenuated trauma-induced myelin disruption. Importantly, UBM treatment resulted in significant neurobehavioral recovery following TBI as demonstrated by improvements in vestibulomotor function; however, no differences in cognitive recovery were observed between the UBM- and vehicle-treated groups. The present study demonstrated that UBM is not only biocompatible within the brain tissue, but also can exert protective effects upon injured brain.

Citing Articles

Hydrogel in the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Li S, Xu J, Qian Y, Zhang R Biomater Res. 2024; 28:0085.

PMID: 39328790 PMC: 11425593. DOI: 10.34133/bmr.0085.


The diffusion of normal skin wound myofibroblast-derived microvesicles differs according to matrix composition.

Arif S, Larochelle S, Trudel B, Gounou C, Bordeleau F, Brisson A J Extracell Biol. 2024; 3(1):e131.

PMID: 38938680 PMC: 11080821. DOI: 10.1002/jex2.131.


Extracellular Vesicles as Regulators of the Extracellular Matrix.

Patel N, Ashraf A, Chung E Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36829629 PMC: 9952427. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020136.


Nanogels as Novel Nanocarrier Systems for Efficient Delivery of CNS Therapeutics.

Zhang Y, Zou Z, Liu S, Miao S, Liu H Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:954470.

PMID: 35928954 PMC: 9343834. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.954470.


A Prosperous Application of Hydrogels With Extracellular Vesicles Release for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Chen Y, Lin J, Yan W Front Neurol. 2022; 13:908468.

PMID: 35720072 PMC: 9201053. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.908468.


References
1.
Liu C, Apuzzo M, Tirrell D . Engineering of the extracellular matrix: working toward neural stem cell programming and neurorestoration--concept and progress report. Neurosurgery. 2003; 52(5):1154-65; discussion 1165-7. View

2.
Freytes D, Martin J, Velankar S, Lee A, Badylak S . Preparation and rheological characterization of a gel form of the porcine urinary bladder matrix. Biomaterials. 2008; 29(11):1630-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.014. View

3.
Hoane M, Becerra G, Shank J, Tatko L, Pak E, Smith M . Transplantation of neuronal and glial precursors dramatically improves sensorimotor function but not cognitive function in the traumatically injured brain. J Neurotrauma. 2004; 21(2):163-74. DOI: 10.1089/089771504322778622. View

4.
Ortuzar N, Argandona E, Bengoetxea H, Lafuente J . Combination of intracortically administered VEGF and environmental enrichment enhances brain protection in developing rats. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2010; 118(1):135-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-010-0496-2. View

5.
Badylak S . The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material. Biomaterials. 2007; 28(25):3587-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.043. View