» Articles » PMID: 23596396

Restoration of Upper Limb Movement Via Artificial Corticospinal and Musculospinal Connections in a Monkey with Spinal Cord Injury

Overview
Date 2013 Apr 19
PMID 23596396
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Functional loss of limb control in individuals with spinal cord injury or stroke can be caused by interruption of corticospinal pathways, although the neural circuits located above and below the lesion remain functional. An artificial neural connection that bridges the lost pathway and connects cortical to spinal circuits has potential to ameliorate the functional loss. We investigated the effects of introducing novel artificial neural connections in a paretic monkey that had a unilateral spinal cord lesion at the C2 level. The first application bridged the impaired spinal lesion. This allowed the monkey to drive the spinal stimulation through volitionally controlled power of high-gamma activity in either the premotor or motor cortex, and thereby to acquire a force-matching target. The second application created an artificial recurrent connection from a paretic agonist muscle to a spinal site, allowing muscle-controlled spinal stimulation to boost on-going activity in the muscle. These results suggest that artificial neural connections can compensate for interrupted descending pathways and promote volitional control of upper limb movement after damage of descending pathways such as spinal cord injury or stroke.

Citing Articles

Presymptomatic Targeted Circuit Manipulation for Ameliorating Huntington's Disease Pathogenesis.

Ikefuama E, Slaviero A, Schalau R, Gott M, Tree M, Dunbar G bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39091860 PMC: 11291159. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.24.604946.


Non-Invasive Brain Sensing Technologies for Modulation of Neurological Disorders.

Alfihed S, Majrashi M, Ansary M, Alshamrani N, Albrahim S, Alsolami A Biosensors (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39056611 PMC: 11274405. DOI: 10.3390/bios14070335.


Rehabilitation Training after Spinal Cord Injury Affects Brain Structure and Function: From Mechanisms to Methods.

He L, Guo X, Zhao C, Rao J Biomedicines. 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38255148 PMC: 10813763. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010041.


Combinatorial Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation and Task-Specific Training to Enhance Hand Motor Output after Paralysis.

Oh J, Scheffler M, Mahan E, King S, Martin C, Dinh J Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2024; 29(Suppl):15-22.

PMID: 38174129 PMC: 10759855. DOI: 10.46292/sci23-00040S.


Rattractor-Instant guidance of a rat into a virtual cage using the deep brain stimulation.

Sudo N, Fujiwara S, Isoyama T, Fukayama O PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0287033.

PMID: 37315056 PMC: 10266595. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287033.


References
1.
Maier M, Perlmutter S, Fetz E . Response patterns and force relations of monkey spinal interneurons during active wrist movement. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 80(5):2495-513. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.5.2495. View

2.
Miller K, Zanos S, Fetz E, den Nijs M, Ojemann J . Decoupling the cortical power spectrum reveals real-time representation of individual finger movements in humans. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(10):3132-7. PMC: 6666461. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5506-08.2009. View

3.
Gaunt R, Prochazka A, Mushahwar V, Guevremont L, Ellaway P . Intraspinal microstimulation excites multisegmental sensory afferents at lower stimulus levels than local alpha-motoneuron responses. J Neurophysiol. 2006; 96(6):2995-3005. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00061.2006. View

4.
Leuthardt E, Schalk G, Wolpaw J, Ojemann J, Moran D . A brain-computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J Neural Eng. 2005; 1(2):63-71. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/1/2/001. View

5.
Fetz E, FINOCCHIO D . Correlations between activity of motor cortex cells and arm muscles during operantly conditioned response patterns. Exp Brain Res. 1975; 23(3):217-40. DOI: 10.1007/BF00239736. View