» Articles » PMID: 23596383

Optogenetic Approaches for Functional Mouse Brain Mapping

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2013 Apr 19
PMID 23596383
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To better understand the connectivity of the brain, it is important to map both structural and functional connections between neurons and cortical regions. In recent years, a set of optogenetic tools have been developed that permit selective manipulation and investigation of neural systems. These tools have enabled the mapping of functional connections between stimulated cortical targets and other brain regions. Advantages of the approach include the ability to arbitrarily stimulate brain regions that express opsins, allowing for brain mapping independent of behavior or sensory processing. The ability of opsins to be rapidly and locally activated allows for investigation of connectivity with spatial resolution on the order of single neurons and temporal resolution on the order of milliseconds. Optogenetic methods for functional mapping have been applied in experiments ranging from in vitro investigation of microcircuits, to in vivo probing of inter-regional cortical connections, to examination of global connections within the whole brain. We review recently developed functional mapping methods that use optogenetic single-point stimulation in the rodent brain and employ cellular electrophysiology, evoked motor movements, voltage sensitive dyes (VSDs), calcium indicators, or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to assess activity. In particular we highlight results using red-shifted organic VSDs that permit high temporal resolution imaging in a manner spectrally separated from Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) activation. VSD maps stimulated by ChR2 were dependent on intracortical synaptic activity and were able to reflect circuits used for sensory processing. Although the methods reviewed are powerful, challenges remain with respect to finding approaches that permit selective high temporal resolution assessment of stimulated activity in animals that can be followed longitudinally.

Citing Articles

Multimodal Nature of the Single-cell Primate Brain Atlas: Morphology, Transcriptome, Electrophysiology, and Connectivity.

Shen Y, Shao M, Hao Z, Huang M, Xu N, Liu S Neurosci Bull. 2024; 40(4):517-532.

PMID: 38194157 PMC: 11003949. DOI: 10.1007/s12264-023-01160-4.


Altered functional connectivity after pilocarpine-induced seizures revealed by intrinsic optical signals imaging in awake mice.

Gong L, Huang X, Hu Z, Chen C, Zhang Z, Liao H Neurophotonics. 2023; 11(1):015001.

PMID: 38125610 PMC: 10729166. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.11.1.015001.


Autonomic dysfunction in epilepsy mouse models with implications for SUDEP research.

Bauer J, Devinsky O, Rothermel M, Koch H Front Neurol. 2023; 13:1040648.

PMID: 36686527 PMC: 9853197. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1040648.


Tracking connectivity maps in human stem cell-derived neuronal networks by holographic optogenetics.

Schmieder F, Habibey R, Striebel J, Buttner L, Czarske J, Busskamp V Life Sci Alliance. 2022; 5(7).

PMID: 35418473 PMC: 9008225. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202101268.


Closed-loop neuromodulation will increase the utility of mouse models in Bioelectronic Medicine.

Datta-Chaudhuri T Bioelectron Med. 2021; 7(1):10.

PMID: 34193309 PMC: 8244222. DOI: 10.1186/s42234-021-00071-x.


References
1.
Tsai P, Kaufhold J, Blinder P, Friedman B, Drew P, Karten H . Correlations of neuronal and microvascular densities in murine cortex revealed by direct counting and colocalization of nuclei and vessels. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(46):14553-70. PMC: 4972024. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3287-09.2009. View

2.
Logothetis N, Pfeuffer J . On the nature of the BOLD fMRI contrast mechanism. Magn Reson Imaging. 2005; 22(10):1517-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2004.10.018. View

3.
Han X, Boyden E . Multiple-color optical activation, silencing, and desynchronization of neural activity, with single-spike temporal resolution. PLoS One. 2007; 2(3):e299. PMC: 1808431. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000299. View

4.
Harris K, Thiele A . Cortical state and attention. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011; 12(9):509-23. PMC: 3324821. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3084. View

5.
Aravanis A, Wang L, Zhang F, Meltzer L, Mogri M, Schneider M . An optical neural interface: in vivo control of rodent motor cortex with integrated fiberoptic and optogenetic technology. J Neural Eng. 2007; 4(3):S143-56. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/3/S02. View