» Articles » PMID: 23594572

Targeted Versus Tailored Multimedia Patient Engagement to Enhance Depression Recognition and Treatment in Primary Care: Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol for the AMEP2 Study

Abstract

Background: Depression in primary care is common, yet this costly and disabling condition remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Persisting gaps in the primary care of depression are due in part to patients' reluctance to bring depressive symptoms to the attention of their primary care clinician and, when depression is diagnosed, to accept initial treatment for the condition. Both targeted and tailored communication strategies offer promise for fomenting discussion and reducing barriers to appropriate initial treatment of depression.

Methods/design: The Activating Messages to Enhance Primary Care Practice (AMEP2) Study is a stratified randomized controlled trial comparing two computerized multimedia patient interventions -- one targeted (to patient gender and income level) and one tailored (to level of depressive symptoms, visit agenda, treatment preferences, depression causal attributions, communication self-efficacy and stigma)-- and an attention control. AMEP2 consists of two linked sub-studies, one focusing on patients with significant depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] scores ≥ 5), the other on patients with few or no depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 < 5). The first sub-study examined effectiveness of the interventions; key outcomes included delivery of components of initial depression care (antidepressant prescription or mental health referral). The second sub-study tracked potential hazards (clinical distraction and overtreatment). A telephone interview screening procedure assessed patients for eligibility and oversampled patients with significant depressive symptoms. Sampled, consenting patients used computers to answer survey questions, be randomized, and view assigned interventions just before scheduled primary care office visits. Patient surveys were also collected immediately post-visit and 12 weeks later. Physicians completed brief reporting forms after each patient's index visit. Additional data were obtained from medical record abstraction and visit audio recordings. Of 6,191 patients assessed, 867 were randomized and included in analysis, with 559 in the first sub-study and 308 in the second.

Discussion: Based on formative research, we developed two novel multimedia programs for encouraging patients to discuss depressive symptoms with their primary care clinicians. Our computer-based enrollment and randomization procedures ensured that randomization was fully concealed and data missingness minimized. Analyses will focus on the interventions' potential benefits among depressed persons, and the potential hazards among the non-depressed.

Trial Registration: ClinicialTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01144104.

Citing Articles

Acceptability of personal contact interventions to address loneliness for people with dementia: An exploratory mixed methods study.

ORourke H, Sidani S, Jeffery N, Prestwich J, McLean H Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024; 2:100009.

PMID: 38745907 PMC: 11080537. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2020.100009.


Psychometric Properties of Three Measures of Stigma Among Hispanics with Depression.

Eghaneyan B, Killian M, Sanchez K, Cabassa L J Immigr Minor Health. 2021; 23(5):946-955.

PMID: 34152503 PMC: 8675222. DOI: 10.1007/s10903-021-01234-3.


Interventions to Increase Depression Treatment Initiation in Primary Care Patients: a Systematic Review.

Moise N, Falzon L, Obi M, Ye S, Patel S, Gonzalez C J Gen Intern Med. 2018; 33(11):1978-1989.

PMID: 30109586 PMC: 6206350. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4554-z.


Monitoring Depression Rates in an Urban Community: Use of Electronic Health Records.

Davidson A, Xu S, Oronce C, Durfee M, McCormick E, Steiner J J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018; 24(6):E6-E14.

PMID: 29334514 PMC: 6170150. DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000751.


The Fracture of Relational Space in Depression: Predicaments in Primary Care Help Seeking.

Bromley E, Kennedy D, Miranda J, Sherbourne C, Wells K Curr Anthropol. 2016; 57(5):610-631.

PMID: 27990025 PMC: 5155333. DOI: 10.1086/688506.


References
1.
Gray G, BRODY D, Hart M . Primary care and the de facto mental health care system: improving care where it counts. Manag Care Interface. 2000; 13(3):62-5. View

2.
Bell R, Paterniti D, Azari R, Duberstein P, Epstein R, Rochlen A . Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: a mixed methods approach to message development. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 78(2):198-205. PMC: 2815180. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.007. View

3.
Manea L, Gilbody S, McMillan D . Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2011; 184(3):E191-6. PMC: 3281183. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.110829. View

4.
Maly R, Frank J, Marshall G, DiMatteo M, Reuben D . Perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions (PEPPI): validation of an instrument in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998; 46(7):889-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02725.x. View

5.
Zhang M, Rost K, Fortney J, Smith G . A community study of depression treatment and employment earnings. Psychiatr Serv. 1999; 50(9):1209-13. DOI: 10.1176/ps.50.9.1209. View