» Articles » PMID: 23593045

Case Management for At-risk Elderly Patients in the English Integrated Care Pilots: Observational Study of Staff and Patient Experience and Secondary Care Utilisation

Overview
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Date 2013 Apr 18
PMID 23593045
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: In 2009, the English Department of Health appointed 16 integrated care pilots which aimed to provide better integrated care. We report the quantitative results from a multi-method evaluation of six of the demonstration projects which used risk profiling tools to identify older people at risk of emergency hospital admission, combined with intensive case management for people identified as at risk. The interventions focused mainly on delivery system redesign and improved clinical information systems, two key elements of Wagner's Chronic Care Model.

Methods: Questionnaires to staff and patients. Difference-in-differences analysis of secondary care utilisation using data on 3646 patients and 17,311 matched controls, and changes in overall secondary care utilisation.

Results: Most staff thought that care for their patients had improved. More patients reported having a care plan but they found it significantly harder to see a doctor or nurse of their choice and felt less involved in decisions about their care. Case management interventions were associated with a 9% increase in emergency admissions. We found some evidence of imbalance between cases and controls which could have biased this estimate, but simulations of the possible effect of unobserved confounders showed that it was very unlikely that the sites achieved their goal of reducing emergency admissions. However, we found significant reductions of 21% and 22% in elective admissions and outpatient attendance in the six months following an intervention, and overall inpatient and outpatient costs were significantly reduced by 9% during this period. Area level analyses of whole practice populations suggested that overall outpatient attendances were significantly reduced by 5% two years after the start of the case management schemes.

Conclusion: Case management may result in improvements in some aspects of care and has the potential to reduce secondary care costs. However, to improve patient experience, case management approaches need to be introduced in a way which respects patients' wishes, for example the ability to see a familiar doctor or nurse.

Citing Articles

The Long-Term Impacts of an Integrated Care Programme on Hospital Utilisation among Older Adults in the South of England: A Synthetic Control Study.

Seamer P, Lloyd T, Conti S, ONeill S Int J Integr Care. 2023; 23(3):10.

PMID: 37601031 PMC: 10437138. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.6475.


Back to basics: A mediation analysis approach to addressing the fundamental questions of integrated care evaluations.

Lugo-Palacios D, Clarke J, Kristensen S Health Econ. 2023; 32(9):2080-2097.

PMID: 37232044 PMC: 10947178. DOI: 10.1002/hec.4713.


Studying both patient and staff experience to investigate their perceptions and to target key interactions to improve: a scoping review.

Crubezy M, Corbin S, Hyvert S, Michel P, Haesebaert J BMJ Open. 2022; 12(10):e061155.

PMID: 36216415 PMC: 9557797. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061155.


Strategies for utilisation management of hospital services: a systematic review of interventions.

Doshmangir L, Khabiri R, Jabbari H, Arab-Zozani M, Kakemam E, Gordeev V Global Health. 2022; 18(1):53.

PMID: 35606776 PMC: 9125833. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-022-00835-3.


Integrated Care in England - what can we Learn from a Decade of National Pilot Programmes?.

Lewis R, Checkland K, Durand M, Ling T, Mays N, Roland M Int J Integr Care. 2021; 21(4):5.

PMID: 34754281 PMC: 8555475. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5631.


References
1.
McAlister F, Stewart S, Ferrua S, McMurray J . Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: a systematic review of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44(4):810-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.055. View

2.
Normand S, Landrum M, Guadagnoli E, Ayanian J, Ryan T, Cleary P . Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001; 54(4):387-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00321-8. View

3.
Glynn L, Valderas J, Healy P, Burke E, Newell J, Gillespie P . The prevalence of multimorbidity in primary care and its effect on health care utilization and cost. Fam Pract. 2011; 28(5):516-23. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmr013. View

4.
Baker A, Leak P, Ritchie L, Lee A, Fielding S . Anticipatory care planning and integration: a primary care pilot study aimed at reducing unplanned hospitalisation. Br J Gen Pract. 2012; 62(595):e113-20. PMC: 3268490. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X625175. View

5.
Austin P, Grootendorst P, Anderson G . A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study. Stat Med. 2006; 26(4):734-53. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2580. View